130 results for “General Electric”, page 6 of 7
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · November 27, 2017 · in the opinion
Donohue v. CBS Corporation (2017)
…notices of removal, there are nearly two dozen other defendants involved in this action. As a general matter, "the consent of all defendants in a multiparty case is a precondition to removal." Green v. Nat's…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 18, 2016 · in the opinion
DePriest v. Crane Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2016)
…Here, the evidence that plaintiffs' medical experts intend to submit has the potential to sufficiently establish a general connection between asbestos and mesothelioma, as well as a scientific expression of plaintiffs' exposure levels based on Stagnito…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2014 · in the opinion
Hellam v. Crane Co. (2014)
…General Motors Corp., supra, 8 Cal.4th at p. 566.) This test "is not necessarily foreclosed simply because the product at issue is only in specialized use, so that the general public may not be familiar…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · February 12, 2013 · in the opinion
Nelson v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp. (2013)
…2012) ("As a general rule, the existence of removal jurisdiction is determined at the time the removal petition is filed, irrespective of subsequent events. Federal courts have applied this general rule to federal officer removal jurisdiction…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion
Brewer v. Crane Co. (2012)
…manual, which he described as a "Navy document that originated with the manufacturer." These general statements do not constitute evidence that Crane specified or required the use of asbestos in its replacement gaskets and packing. The…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · November 30, 2020 · in the opinion
Phelps v. CBS Corporation (2020)
…Plaintiff may offer evidence to establish facts upon which Mr. Paskal relies, including video testimony from Grimes and general testimony from the Plaintiff's Naval Expert, Mr. Paskal's opinions cannot be excluded at this stage…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 17, 2016 · in the opinion
Jackson v. 84 Lumber Co. (2016)
…(Union Carbide, Crane) Defendant's general motion to preclude regulatory materials and public health pronouncements regarding asbestos is denied as overly broad more properly an evidentiary issue for trial. The Court will consider the admissibility of…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 27, 2016 · in the opinion
Dandridge v. Crane Co. (2016)
…injuries, and consequently, less justification for a departure from the general rule under maritime law that "a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · July 14, 2014 · in the opinion
Smith v. Crane Co. (2014)
…there are persuasive indications that the highest state court would decide the issue differently." Allen, 128 F.3d at 466; Clarin Corp. v. Massachusetts General Life Ins. Co., 44 F.3d 471, 474 (7th Cir. 1994)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Utah · June 24, 2013 · in the opinion
Anderson v. Ford Motor Company (2013)
…Dr. Dikman testified that the general population is exposed to asbestos in the ambient air.\[16\] Dr. Dikman clarified that "the measurements in the air samples in the general population, and air samples have been used…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · April 16, 2018 · in the opinion
Nichols v. Allis Chalmers Product Liability Trust (2018)
…L. Rev. 457, 463 (2017). \[6\] For purposes of discussion, this Court notes that as a general rule, no legal duty exists in Rhode Island to control a third party's conduct. Santana v. Rainbow Cleaners…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 28, 2015 · in the opinion
McALVEY v. Atlas Copco Compressors, LLC (2015)
…limited to the frequency, regularity and proximity of Plaintiff's exposure to asbestos products in general and his conclusion that Plaintiff experienced a significant exposure to asbestos based on his work activities. Finally, Defendants argue that…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · July 3, 2014 · in the opinion
Harris v. Ajax Boiler, Inc. (2014)
…the overhaul of any of the defendants' boilers. Plaintiff has no evidence to show that defendants' boilers required the use of an asbestos-containing cement, in general, or Narcolite in particular, to affect a proper repair…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 24, 2019 · in the opinion
Stock v. Jenkins Bros. (IN the Matter of the Eighth Judicial District Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…with Jenkins valves' asbestos-containing components: "Q. Now what asbestos-containing products did you handle or use or replace, with respect to the Jenkins valves, the general types of products? A. Well, on that specific valve…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion
Rothchild v. Crane Co. (2014)
…467 U.S. 69, 73 (1984). As a general rule, the Court must "limit\[\] its consideration to the pleadings and exhibits attached thereto" when deciding a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. Grossman v. Nationsbank…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · September 4, 2014 · in the opinion
Tucker v. CompuDyne Corp. (2014)
…that the trial court properly ordered the disclosure of paragraphs 18(a) and (b). Because the attorney-client privilege is an exception to the general rules of disclosure, where it obstructs the search for relevant information…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · July 21, 2017 · in the opinion
Haskins v. 3M Company (2017)
…tested; (2) has been subjected to peer review and publication; (3) has a known or potential rate of error; and (4) has attained general acceptance in the pertinent scientific community. See id. at 593-94. In…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 6, 2014 · in the opinion
McMann v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2014)
…In this way, the statute "promotes litigating federal defenses in a federal forum so that \the operations of the general government \[are not\] arrested at the will of one of \[the states\]." Ruppel v. CBS Corp…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 1, 2009 · in the opinion
Handley v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2009)
…purpose of judicial construction of a statute is to determine the meaning that comports most closely with the intent of the Legislature "\with the view to promoting rather than defeating the general purpose of the statute…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · January 21, 2016 · in the opinion
Holzworth v. Alfa Laval Inc. (2016)
…in causing the injury he suffered." See Lindstrom v. A-C Prod. Liab. Tr., 424 F.3d 488, 492 (6th Cir. 2005) (general maritime law); In re Joint E. & S. Dists. Asbestos Litig., No. 92 Civ…