130 results for “General Electric”, page 7 of 7
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · April 25, 2014 · in the opinion
Leite v. Crane Co. (2014)
…of the rules discussed above for resolving such challenges. We recognize that defendants enjoy much broader removal rights under the federal officer removal statute than they do under the general removal statute, 28 U.S.C…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2009 · in the opinion
Wangen v. Gardner Denver, Inc. (2009)
…d\] that Soco West, Inc. is not subject to jurisdiction in the State of Washington." Plant Insulation Company presented a declaration from its general counsel. Based upon his personal knowledge, he averred that the company was…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion
Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)
…No. 828 684, Answers of Defendant John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. in Response to General Order No. 29 Interrogatories 6:4-18, 12:4-7). Defendant's gasket sheet materials were "various shades of grey, with Defendant…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · April 17, 2014 · in the opinion
Sclafani v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2014)
…Rptr. 456 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Consistent with this general rule, the California Supreme Court held in Rutherford that an asbestos personal injury plaintiff need not prove with certainty that the defendant's product…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 7, 2015 · in the opinion
Hackshaw v. Crane Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)
…the jury charge. Although Crane made a general objection that it did not have any duty to warn on the ground that it did not actually place the products into the stream of commerce, it never…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 2, 2014 · in the opinion
McMann v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)
…an exception to the general rule that employers are not liable for injuries suffered by independent contractors: "A common-law exception to the rule of nonliability \[for injuries to independent contractors\] exists where the employer of…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 22, 2014 · in the opinion
Burns v. All Acquisitions, LLC (2014)
…alleging state law claims and there does not appear to be diversity of citizenship. "The well established general rule is that jurisdiction is determined at the time of removal and nothing filed after removal affects jurisdiction…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · July 6, 2023 · in the opinion
Welch v. Crane Co. (2023)
…each of their experts' reports, and Plaintiff will have the opportunity to object to such testimony at trial. And general causation testimony may be relevant and helpful to the trier of fact. Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 6, 2013 · in the opinion
Peraica v. Crane Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2013)
…such as Peraica were at high risk of injury due to high-dose asbestos exposure from removing ACMs from Defendant's boilers (far more than a general awareness of the linkage between asbestos exposure and disease)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 29, 2016 · in the opinion
Rhodes v. McIC, Inc. (2016)
…Spartan Motors Chassis, Inc., 519 F.3d 192, 199 (4th Cir. 2008) (language in general removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a), "is deliberately parallel to the requirements for notice pleading found in Rule 8…