No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

14 results for “Owens-Illinois”

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 18, 2009 · in the opinion

    O'neil v. Crane Co. (2009)

    …the plaintiff's favor, rejecting John Crane's argument that the consumer expectation test was inapplicable because expert witnesses were required. (See also Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 465 \[38…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2014 · in the opinion

    Hellam v. Crane Co. (2014)

    …Products Were a Substantial Factor in Causing His Mesothelioma. Crane contends that there was insufficient evidence that its products were a "substantial factor" in causing Hellam's mesothelioma as required under Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 25, 2011 · in the opinion

    Woodard v. Crane Co. (2011)

    …supra, 10 Cal.4th 1185\] and Cadlo \[v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2004) 125 Cal.App.4th 513\] make clear that respondents cannot be strictly liable for failing to warn of the dangers inherent in the asbestos…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · February 12, 2013 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp. (2013)

    …Gypsum Co., 98 Cal. App.4th 1098, 1103, 120 Cal.Rptr.2d 23 (2002) (citations omitted) (citing Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953, 975-76, 67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16, 941 P.2d…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · August 18, 2014 · in the opinion

    Grande v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, Inc. (2014)

    …developing asbestos-related cancer." McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., 98 Cal. App. 4th 1098, 1103 (2002) (citing Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal. 4th 953, 975-76 (1997)); see also O'Neil v. Crane Co.…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Paulus v. Crane Co. (2014)

    …the defendant's asbestos products was, in reasonable medical probability, a substantial factor in causing or contributing to his risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 957-958 \[67…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2008 · in the opinion

    Clemmer v. John Crane, Inc. (2008)

    …new 2003). We have reviewed the instructions given to the jury and conclude that there was no error. Our Supreme Court addressed the issue of causation in asbestos cases in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion

    Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)

    …285). A. Threshold Exposure Plaintiff's claims require proof that Defendant caused or contributed to Donald Willis's exposure to asbestos. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953, 975 (1997) ("\[P\]laintiffs \[bear\] the…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · April 17, 2014 · in the opinion

    Sclafani v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2014)

    …whether Sclafani's exposure to defendants' products "was, in reasonable medical probability, a substantial factor in causing or contributing to his risk of developing cancer." Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953, 957-58…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 16, 2010 · in the opinion

    Hall v. Warren Pumps LLC (2010)

    …causes of action for asbestos-related latent injuries. First, the plaintiff must "establish some threshold exposure to the defendant's defective asbestos-containing products." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 982.) Second…

  11. Court case · California Supreme Court · January 12, 2012 · in the opinion

    O'neil v. Crane Co. (2012)

    …General Principles (8) "Generally speaking, manufacturers have a duty to warn consumers about the hazards inherent in their products. (Anderson \[v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.\], supra, 53 Cal.3d at p. 1003.) The requirement's purpose…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 8, 2010 · in the opinion

    Reaser v. AW Chesterton Company (2010)

    …the forum non conveniens motion can be granted. In that regard, Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753 (Hansen) is instructive. Hansen was an asbestos case with 200 named defendants. (Id…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 17, 2007 · in the opinion

    Slaughter v. Union Carbide Corp. (2007)

    …in Tennessee, there would be personal jurisdiction over all defendants there through the Tennessee Long-Arm Statute. Respondents rely primarily on Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753 (Hansen), to support…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2009 · in the opinion

    Wangen v. Gardner Denver, Inc. (2009)

    …other factors. But the same court also cited with approval the Hansen v. Owens\[-Corning Fiberglas Corp.\] (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753, deferring to that court's opinion in the context of asbestos litigation. The…