No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

48 results for “General Electric”, page 3 of 3

  1. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 15, 2007 · in the opinion

    Vince v. Crane Co. (2007)

    …sua sponte order Owens-Illinois, Inc. dismissed from this appeal. \[3\] The General Assembly effectively overruled paragraph two of the syllabus to Horton with the adoption of R.C. 2307.96(B), effective to cases filed…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 16, 2014 · in the opinion

    Dougherty v. AO Smith Corporation (2014)

    …the Supreme Court explained: It is the general rule that an action may be removed from state court to federal court only if a federal district court would have original jurisdiction over the claim in suit…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · July 25, 2013 · in the opinion

    Cabasug v. Crane Co. (2013)

    …level of generality."). Thus, this inquiry "considers whether the general features of the incident could hypothetically have an effect on maritime commerce. It does not require that any impact actually occurred." Christensen v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.…

  4. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion

    Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2019)

    …the general duty of care includes a duty to warn when the manufacturer "knows or has reason to know" that its product "is or is likely to be dangerous for the use for which it is…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · November 26, 2013 · in the opinion

    Cabasug v. Crane Company (2013)

    …limited; pipefitter journeyman; nuclear inspector, Code 139; General Engineer, Code 365; and Test Engineer and Risk Control. Plaintiffs asserts that he was exposed to asbestos up until 1986 when he was promoted to an office job…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · March 24, 2016 · in the opinion

    Holland v. Airco, Inc. (2016)

    …Judge Robreno because regardless of what causation standard applies, it is a general principle of Alabama tort law that the plaintiff bears the burden of submitting evidence proving that the defendant caused his injuries. See Turner…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · June 9, 2014 · in the opinion

    Mohler v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)

    …a)(1).\[1\] Plaintiff now seeks remand of this matter, arguing that the statute does not apply. STANDARD In general, any civil action filed in state court may be removed to the district court if this…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 7, 2014 · in the opinion

    Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)

    …477 U.S. at 257. The moving defendants principally challenge the plaintiffs' evidence of exposure and causation as a general matter without distinguishing between the causes of action. In a case where the plaintiff developed asbestosis…