No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · February 7, 2014

    Cabasug v. Crane Company (2014)

    …court found no evidence that Emhart's distillers contained asbestos or that Emhart supplied asbestos replacement parts, since the plaintiffs relied on general expert statements about what manufacturers typically did. Griscom-Russell had dissolved in 1962…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Georgia · December 27, 2013

    Cabasug v. Crane Company (2013)

    …law, the court found no evidence that Emhart's distillers contained asbestos components or that Emhart supplied asbestos replacement parts, and the expert's statements were too general. The Griscom-Russell company dissolved in 1962, before…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 16, 2014 · in the opinion

    Dougherty v. AO Smith Corporation (2014)

    …the Supreme Court explained: It is the general rule that an action may be removed from state court to federal court only if a federal district court would have original jurisdiction over the claim in suit…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · July 25, 2013 · in the opinion

    Cabasug v. Crane Co. (2013)

    …level of generality."). Thus, this inquiry "considers whether the general features of the incident could hypothetically have an effect on maritime commerce. It does not require that any impact actually occurred." Christensen v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · November 26, 2013 · in the opinion

    Cabasug v. Crane Company (2013)

    …limited; pipefitter journeyman; nuclear inspector, Code 139; General Engineer, Code 365; and Test Engineer and Risk Control. Plaintiffs asserts that he was exposed to asbestos up until 1986 when he was promoted to an office job…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · June 9, 2014 · in the opinion

    Mohler v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)

    …a)(1).\[1\] Plaintiff now seeks remand of this matter, arguing that the statute does not apply. STANDARD In general, any civil action filed in state court may be removed to the district court if this…