20 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 15, 2007 · in the opinion
Vince v. Crane Co. (2007)
…to the defendant's asbestos; "(4) Any factors that mitigated or enhanced the plaintiff's exposure to asbestos. \[4\] We take issue with the estate's citation to Gates v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (Dec. 3…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · February 19, 2015 · in the opinion
Bray v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. (2015)
… Chavez v. Noble Drilling Corp., 567 F.2d 287, 289 (5th Cir. 1978); Sheffield v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 595 So. 2d 443, 450 (Ala. 1992) (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 433b, comment a). \[5\] Defendant…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 11, 2008 · in the opinion
Norris v. Crane Company (2008)
…and reasonably foreseeable manner; or (2) whether the benefits of the challenged design outweigh the risk of danger inherent in the design. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995; Barker v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 2, 2003 · in the opinion
Lindstrom v. AC Products Liability Trust (2003)
…that he has suffered damages, and 3) prove that defendant's asbestos-containing product was a substantial factor in causing his damages. Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 726 F.Supp. 172, 174 (W.D.Mich…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 7, 2014 · in the opinion
Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)
…time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked.'" Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prods., Inc., 69 F.3d 712, 716 (4th Cir. 1995) (applying Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 25, 2009 · in the opinion
Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. Inc. (2009)
…548, 568, fn. 5 \[34 Cal.Rptr.2d 607, 882 P.2d 298\]; Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 994 \[281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549\] (Anderson); Daly v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 16, 2014 · in the opinion
Dougherty v. AO Smith Corporation (2014)
…federal defense; and (4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d Cir. 1998…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · November 26, 2013 · in the opinion
Cabasug v. Crane Company (2013)
…the December 23, 2013 hearing prepared to argue the issue of successor liability. \[3\] See, e.g., Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 716 (4th Cir. 1995) (North Carolina law); Jackson v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion
Faddish v. Buffalo Pumps (2012)
…Ferayorni v. Hyundai Motor Co., 711 So.2d 1167, 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), following Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 53 Cal.3d 987, 281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549, 558 (1991). Under…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · March 13, 2008 · in the opinion
Woody v. AW Chesterton Company (2008)
…9, 1993); Fisher v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 868 F.2d 1175 (10th Cir. 1989). After careful review of the release language and the circumstances surrounding its signing, as part of the settlement of a pending…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Rhode Island · July 1, 2021 · in the opinion
Moore v. Crane Company (2021)
…precluded it from notifying individuals of the presence of asbestos in the work environment. Id. at [\4]. A similar conclusion was reached in Faulk v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 48 F. Supp. 2d 653 (E.D…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 25, 2016 · in the opinion
Arbogast v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)
…defendant "\on a regular basis, over some extended period of time, in proximity to where the \[plaintiff\] actually worked'" (quoting Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1162-63 (4th Cir. 1986) (emphasis omitted…
-
Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · January 4, 2021 · in the opinion
Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)
…statutory construction is to ascertain and give effect to the legislative intent without unduly restricting or expanding a statute's coverage beyond its intended scope." Howard, 504 S.W.3d at 269 (quoting Owens v. State…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 21, 2011 · in the opinion
Linster v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2011)
…J.H. France Refractories Co., J.P. Stevens, Inc., Melrath Gasket, Inc., Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., Owens-Illinois, Inc., Pecora Corporation, Rapid American Corporation, Rhone-Poulenc, Riley Stoker Corporation, Sepco Corporation, Inc., Sid Harvey Midatlantic, Inc…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · July 25, 2013 · in the opinion
Cabasug v. Crane Co. (2013)
…Lee, Dang & Sullivan, Stephanie L. Marn, Weinberg Roger & Rosenfeld, Corlis J. Chang, John R. Lacy, Marissa Lei Lin Owens, Goodsill Anderson Quinn & Stifel LLLP, Judy A. Tanaka, Richard J. Kowen, Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing, Honolulu, HI…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · March 24, 2016
Holland v. Airco, Inc. (2016)
…and Goulds Pumps, ending the plaintiff's claims over Owen Holland's mesothelioma death. Under Alabama law a plaintiff must first prove exposure to an asbestos-containing product for which the defendant is responsible. Evidence that…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 1, 2012 · in the opinion
Conner v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2012)
…now holds that, under maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute.
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · February 7, 2014 · in the opinion
Cabasug v. Crane Company (2014)
…third parties (often provided years later), and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in asbestos-containing replacement parts that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute. B. Maxim's Motion for Summary Judgment…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2019)
…e have no basis to conclude in this diversity case that the Tennessee Supreme Court would overrule its prior decisions holding that a manufacturer owes no duty of care to consumers of products made by others…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Georgia · December 27, 2013 · in the opinion
Cabasug v. Crane Company (2013)
…third parties (often provided years later), and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in asbestos-containing replacement parts that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute. B. Maxim's Motion for Summary Judgment…