20 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 15, 2007
Vince v. Crane Co. (2007)
…appeals court affirmed summary judgments for Crane Company and Goodyear Tire & Rubber against the estate of Nathalie Vince, and dismissed Owens-Illinois from the appeal because it had settled with the estate. Under Horton v. Harwick…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 11, 2008 · in the opinion
Norris v. Crane Company (2008)
…Indeed, both parties assumed that quite complicated design considerations were at issue, and that expert testimony was necessary to illuminate these matters." (Ibid.) In Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., supra, 32 Cal.App.4th at page…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 25, 2016 · in the opinion
Arbogast v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)
…cause of the injuries, and (4) that the product was expected to and did reach the consumer without substantial change in its condition." Phipps, 363 A.2d at 958, quoted in Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 21, 2011 · in the opinion
Linster v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2011)
…J.H. France Refractories Co., J.P. Stevens, Inc., Melrath Gasket, Inc., Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., Owens-Illinois, Inc., Pecora Corporation, Rapid American Corporation, Rhone-Poulenc, Riley Stoker Corporation, Sepco Corporation, Inc., Sid Harvey Midatlantic, Inc…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 25, 2009 · in the opinion
Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. Inc. (2009)
…this argument, and Cadlo demonstrates that it is fundamentally flawed. We held in Cadlo that Owens-Illinois could not be held strictly liable for Kaylo, a product that it developed and then Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · July 25, 2013 · in the opinion
Cabasug v. Crane Co. (2013)
…the function and role of the parties; (3) the types of vehicles and instrumentalities involved; and (4) the causation and nature of the injury suffered." Id. at 1121-22 (quoting Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. U.S…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · March 13, 2008 · in the opinion
Woody v. AW Chesterton Company (2008)
…Const. Co., Inc., 545 S.W.2d 8, 11-12 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1976); Ballinger v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 829 F.2d 38, No. 86-5755, 1987 WL 44451, at [\1] (6th Cir. Sept. 14, 1987…
-
Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · January 4, 2021 · in the opinion
Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)
…statutory construction is to ascertain and give effect to the legislative intent without unduly restricting or expanding a statute's coverage beyond its intended scope." Howard, 504 S.W.3d at 269 (quoting Owens v. State…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · February 19, 2015 · in the opinion
Bray v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. (2015)
… Chavez v. Noble Drilling Corp., 567 F.2d 287, 289 (5th Cir. 1978); Sheffield v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 595 So. 2d 443, 450 (Ala. 1992) (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 433b, comment a). \[5\] Defendant…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 2, 2003 · in the opinion
Lindstrom v. AC Products Liability Trust (2003)
…that he has suffered damages, and 3) prove that defendant's asbestos-containing product was a substantial factor in causing his damages. Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 726 F.Supp. 172, 174 (W.D.Mich…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 7, 2014 · in the opinion
Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)
…case "must present \evidence of exposure to a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked.'" Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prods.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 16, 2014 · in the opinion
Dougherty v. AO Smith Corporation (2014)
…federal defense; and (4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d Cir. 1998…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Rhode Island · July 1, 2021 · in the opinion
Moore v. Crane Company (2021)
…precluded it from notifying individuals of the presence of asbestos in the work environment. Id. at [\4]. A similar conclusion was reached in Faulk v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 48 F. Supp. 2d 653 (E.D…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · November 26, 2013 · in the opinion
Cabasug v. Crane Company (2013)
…the December 23, 2013 hearing prepared to argue the issue of successor liability. \[3\] See, e.g., Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 716 (4th Cir. 1995) (North Carolina law); Jackson v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion
Faddish v. Buffalo Pumps (2012)
…Ferayorni v. Hyundai Motor Co., 711 So.2d 1167, 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), following Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 53 Cal.3d 987, 281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549, 558 (1991). Under…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · March 24, 2016
Holland v. Airco, Inc. (2016)
…and Goulds Pumps, ending the plaintiff's claims over Owen Holland's mesothelioma death. Under Alabama law a plaintiff must first prove exposure to an asbestos-containing product for which the defendant is responsible. Evidence that…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 1, 2012 · in the opinion
Conner v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2012)
…now holds that, under maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute.
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · February 7, 2014 · in the opinion
Cabasug v. Crane Company (2014)
…third parties (often provided years later), and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in asbestos-containing replacement parts that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute. B. Maxim's Motion for Summary Judgment…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2019)
…e have no basis to conclude in this diversity case that the Tennessee Supreme Court would overrule its prior decisions holding that a manufacturer owes no duty of care to consumers of products made by others…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Georgia · December 27, 2013 · in the opinion
Cabasug v. Crane Company (2013)
…third parties (often provided years later), and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in asbestos-containing replacement parts that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute. B. Maxim's Motion for Summary Judgment…