No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

4 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Vinson v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)

    …this work, on its own, leaves only the general possibility that Covil insulation was likewise present. Plaintiffs next argue that Mr. Vinson worked in close proximity to Covil employees who were installing or maintaining insulation. The…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Brock v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)

    …the insulation at the RJ Reynolds plant," he answered that he did not "recall exactly who was working" and testified only that Daniel employees were general contractors who "did all kind of different jobs." (ECF No…

  3. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion

    Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2019)

    …the general duty of care includes a duty to warn when the manufacturer "knows or has reason to know" that its product "is or is likely to be dangerous for the use for which it is…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · December 11, 2018 · in the opinion

    Connor v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (2018)

    …1979, testified that, in his role as a general foreman at the Fiber Industries facility, he ordered\[6\] insulation material from Covil because Daniel International "had a contract to buy \[insulation\] through Covil." (ECF No. 208…