8 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 23, 2018 · in the opinion
Leech v. 3M Company (2018)
…Martin James Dempsey, Jr., Cosmich Simmons & Brown, PLLC. CBS Corporation, Successor by Merger to CBS, Corp a Pennsylvania Corp. & General Electric Company, Defendants, represented by John Joseph Hainkel, III, Frilot L.L.C., Angela M. Bowlin…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 29, 2017 · in the opinion
Leech v. 3M Company (2017)
…Eagan, Frilot L.L.C., Magali Ann Puente-Martin, Frilot L.L.C. & Peter R. Tafaro, Frilot L.L.C.. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by John Joseph Hainkel, III, Frilot L.L.C., Angela M…
-
Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · March 22, 2012 · in the opinion
Simpkins v. CSX Transp., Inc. (2012)
…a matter of law. See, e.g., Martin v. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co., 561 F.3d 439, 445 (6th Cir.2009); In re Certified Question From the Fourteenth District Court of Appeals of Texas, 479 Mich…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · November 2, 2018
Fagot v. Dow Chemical Company (2018)
…employers, contractors and premises owners, claiming he developed mesothelioma from asbestos exposure while working as a pipefitter/welder. Turner was a general contractor at Honeywell's Geismar, Louisiana facility. Fagot settled his claims against Honeywell. Honeywell…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 1, 2014 · in the opinion
Smith v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014)
…at 3. "In general, a premises owner has a duty of exercising reasonable care for the safety of persons on its premises and a duty of not exposing such persons to unreasonable risks of injury or…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · July 22, 2016 · in the opinion
Hartfield v. 3M Company (2016)
…however, because she did not allege that the dealership had knowledge of the defect when it sold the car and state law did not impose on the dealership a general post-sale duty to warn. Id…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 11, 2015 · in the opinion
Smith v. Union Carbide Corporation (2015)
…509 U.S. at 596. As a general rule, questions relating to the basis and sources of an expert's opinion rather than its admissibility should be left for the jury's consideration. United States v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 30, 2017 · in the opinion
Leech v. 3M Co. (2017)
…the removal statute's unanimity requirement, all defendants removing under the general removal statute must join in or consent to removal if they have been "properly joined and served."\[79\] Here, the parties do not dispute…