No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

8 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 28, 2020 · in the opinion

    Sabetian v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2020)

    …California Gas Leak Cases (2019) 7 Cal.5th 391, 397 \[247 Cal.Rptr.3d 632, 441 P.3d 881\].) "In general, each person has a duty to act with reasonable care under the circumstances." (Regents, supra…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 7, 2021 · in the opinion

    Irani v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (2021)

    …refinery, including Standard Oil of New Jersey's employee Paul Kuhl, who became general manager of the refinery. Soler testified as the person most qualified for the Chevron defendants in Sabetian v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 20, 2021 · in the opinion

    Khosravan v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2021)

    …391, 397; accord, Sabetian, supra, 57 Cal.App.5th at p. 1070.) "In general, each person has a duty to act with reasonable care under the circumstances." (Regents, supra, 4 Cal.5th at p. 619; accord…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion

    Petitpas v. Ford Motor Company (2017)

    …1103.) Even assuming Dr. Horn is correct as to the cause of mesothelioma in general, plaintiffs had the burden to prove that exposure to asbestos-containing materials at Rossmoor was a substantial factor in contributing to…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 17, 2016 · in the opinion

    Kordestani v. ExxonMOBIL Oil Corporation (2016)

    …the in limine motion \operate\[s\] as a general demurrer to \[the\] complaint or a motion for judgment on the pleadings.' \[Citations.\] \Alternatively,' where such motions are granted \at the outset of trial with reference to…

  6. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · August 3, 2021 · in the opinion

    Viale v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2021)

    …Benicia refinery in a way that affirmatively contributed to Ronald's injuries: at best, the evidence establishes that Exxon exercised general supervision over the work of the independent contractors for whom Ronald worked. See Hooker v…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 11, 2015 · in the opinion

    Murat v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2015)

    …other grounds. \[4\] The evidence showed that Mr. Murat was in charge of Port Welding; Port Welding was the general contractor on each job; Port Welding supplied its own tools, but used the ship's gaskets…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · July 14, 2020 · in the opinion

    Viale v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2020)

    …Co., 44 Cal. 2d 785, 788-90 (1955), "active control" does not include the owner's exercise of "a broad general power of supervision and control. . . so as to insure satisfactory performance," see id. at 790…