19 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 2, 2004
Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2004)
…not know of mesothelioma specifically. It reinstated liability for CertainTeed, Fibreboard and Flintkote, found no error as to Foster Wheeler and General Electric, and removed Gasket Holding. It upheld the damage awards. Exxon owed a virile…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · April 26, 2010 · in the opinion
Anderson v. AJ Friedman Supply Co. (2010)
…Bacon & Davis, Incorporated, Foster Wheeler Energy Corp., Furino & Sons, Inc., Garlock, Inc., General Refractories, Co., General Electric Co., Georgia Pacific, Inc., Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada, Inc., Gorman-Rupp Company, Inc., Greene Tweed…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 28, 2020 · in the opinion
Sabetian v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2020)
…California Gas Leak Cases (2019) 7 Cal.5th 391, 397 \[247 Cal.Rptr.3d 632, 441 P.3d 881\].) "In general, each person has a duty to act with reasonable care under the circumstances." (Regents, supra…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 7, 2021 · in the opinion
Irani v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (2021)
…refinery, including Standard Oil of New Jersey's employee Paul Kuhl, who became general manager of the refinery. Soler testified as the person most qualified for the Chevron defendants in Sabetian v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 20, 2021 · in the opinion
Khosravan v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2021)
…391, 397; accord, Sabetian, supra, 57 Cal.App.5th at p. 1070.) "In general, each person has a duty to act with reasonable care under the circumstances." (Regents, supra, 4 Cal.5th at p. 619; accord…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 14, 2007
Terrance v. Dow Chemical Company (2007)
The court affirmed the judgment on the jury's $5,000,000 general damages verdict for the Terrance estate and surviving spouse against Exxon, and denied Exxon's JNOV, new trial and remittitur motions. Mesothelioma was…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · April 19, 2007 · in the opinion
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Altimore (2007)
Altimore or those "similarly situated" takes the focus off Exxon's knowledge of a general danger relative to the qualities of asbestos. By focusing on epidemiological studies, the majority fails to follow our earlier pronouncement that…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · April 3, 2008
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Altimore (2008)
…its conduct posed an extreme degree of risk. General knowledge of asbestos risk to employees was not evidence of knowledge of an extreme risk to employees' family members. Expert Testimony; Punitive Damages Worksites: Exxon Baytown refinery…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 4, 2016 · in the opinion
Bourke v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (2016)
…56\] In Poche, the court began with the general premise that "\[a\] case that is initially nonremovable may become removable through the voluntary dismissal of nondiverse defendants."\[57\] All but one of the defendants—Eagle, Inc.…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 17, 2016 · in the opinion
Kordestani v. ExxonMOBIL Oil Corporation (2016)
…the in limine motion \operate\[s\] as a general demurrer to \[the\] complaint or a motion for judgment on the pleadings.' \[Citations.\] \Alternatively,' where such motions are granted \at the outset of trial with reference to…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 16, 2019 · in the opinion
Epstein v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…Corporation is directed to serve a copy of this Order with Notice of Entry on all remaining parties, the Trial Support Clerk located in the General Clerk's Office (Room 119), and on the County Clerk…
-
Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · April 24, 2006 · in the opinion
Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2006)
…625 A.2d 1110). B. Applying those general principles of tort liability to the facts of this case, the risk of injury to someone like Eleanor Olivo is one that should have been foreseeable to Exxon…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · May 5, 2005 · in the opinion
Olivo v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (2005)
…In New Jersey, however, the common law of premises liability "has undergone transition toward \a broadening application of a general tort obligation to exercise reasonable care against foreseeable harm to others.'" Sussman, supra, 373 N.J…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · August 3, 2021 · in the opinion
Viale v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2021)
…Benicia refinery in a way that affirmatively contributed to Ronald's injuries: at best, the evidence establishes that Exxon exercised general supervision over the work of the independent contractors for whom Ronald worked. See Hooker v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · July 14, 2020 · in the opinion
Viale v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2020)
…Co., 44 Cal. 2d 785, 788-90 (1955), "active control" does not include the owner's exercise of "a broad general power of supervision and control. . . so as to insure satisfactory performance," see id. at 790…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion
Krik v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2017)
…our holding in this case, we note that in general investigating a sitting juror is fraught with danger — such an investigation could be seen by the juror as intimidation or harassment. Such an investigation might lead…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 9, 2008 · in the opinion
Spillman v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2008)
…Roggli testified that an examination of a lung tissue sample from Mr. Spillman confirmed that he was exposed to asbestos at a rate much higher than that of the general background population. \[3\] La. C.C…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · November 9, 2001 · in the opinion
Emery v. Owens-Corporation (2001)
…suitable references to plaintiff's closing argument), we issue a precautionary warning that the general reference to "witnesses" in its admissibility assertion skirts the outer perimeter of Rule 2-12.4. \[9\] See La. Acts 1979…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 1, 2006 · in the opinion
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Altimore (2006)
…9 (Tex. App.CHouston \[14th Dist.\] 2004, pet. denied). Foreseeability requires only that the general danger, not the exact sequence of events that produced the harm, be foreseeable. Id. The Texas Supreme Court has frequently stated…