No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

4 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · April 19, 2007 · in the opinion

    Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Altimore (2007)

    Altimore or those "similarly situated" takes the focus off Exxon's knowledge of a general danger relative to the qualities of asbestos. By focusing on epidemiological studies, the majority fails to follow our earlier pronouncement that…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 29, 2022 · in the opinion

    Hotard v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2022)

    …the evidence suggests that they nevertheless mandated asbestos-containing materials be used in the Vessels' construction without warning the general contractor or any subcontractors about the risks of asbestos or how to safely handle the substance…

  3. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · May 5, 2005 · in the opinion

    Olivo v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (2005)

    …In New Jersey, however, the common law of premises liability "has undergone transition toward \a broadening application of a general tort obligation to exercise reasonable care against foreseeable harm to others.'" Sussman, supra, 373 N.J…

  4. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 1, 2006 · in the opinion

    Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Altimore (2006)

    …9 (Tex. App.CHouston \[14th Dist.\] 2004, pet. denied). Foreseeability requires only that the general danger, not the exact sequence of events that produced the harm, be foreseeable. Id. The Texas Supreme Court has frequently stated…