6 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 6, 2020 · in the opinion
Lopez v. McDERMOTT, Inc (2020)
…inherent in the job. R. Doc. 449-2 at 19. In general, a premises owner has a duty to protect persons on the premises from the unreasonable risk of harm. Mundy v. Dep't of Health…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 29, 2022 · in the opinion
Hotard v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2022)
…the evidence suggests that they nevertheless mandated asbestos-containing materials be used in the Vessels' construction without warning the general contractor or any subcontractors about the risks of asbestos or how to safely handle the substance…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · April 10, 2015 · in the opinion
Schaffer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2015)
…cited in the Petition that creates a federal cause of action. Moreover, a case with a general maritime nature requesting common law remedies does not provide a ground for federal jurisdiction. Pierce v. Parker Towing Co.…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 11, 2015 · in the opinion
Murat v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2015)
…other grounds. \[4\] The evidence showed that Mr. Murat was in charge of Port Welding; Port Welding was the general contractor on each job; Port Welding supplied its own tools, but used the ship's gaskets…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 3, 2024 · in the opinion
Hotard v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2024)
…F.2d 1078, 1081 (5th Cir. 1984) ("Long-established general principles of interpreting indemnity agreements require that indemnification for an indemnitee's own negligence be clearly and unequivocally expressed."); see also Donahue v. Republic Nat'l…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013 · in the opinion
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Minton (2013)
…Scindia, 451 U.S. at 167. Exxon argues that there was no active involvement because its supervision did not extend beyond general oversight. Using the language of the court in Dow v. Oldendorff Carriers GMBH & Co.…