No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

135 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 2 of 7

  1. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 25, 2013

    Dixon v. Ford Motor Company (2013)

    …the intermediate appellate court, reinstated the jury verdicts for the Dixon plaintiffs against Ford Motor Company, and reversed the trial court's judgment for Ford on its cross-claim against Georgia-Pacific, which won back the…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 21, 2020

    Michel v. Ford Motor Company (2020)

    …the Michel plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a second supplemental and amended complaint adding Ford Leasing Development Company, LLC as a defendant, over Ford Motor Company's opposition. Where a scheduling order deadline has passed…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 2012

    Campbell v. Ford Motor Company (2012)

    The Court of Appeal reversed the judgment for plaintiff Honer (continued by her daughter Mary Campbell) against Ford, holding Ford owed her no duty, so Ford prevailed. Under the Rowland factors as clarified in Cabral, an…

  4. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 16, 2013

    Webber v. Ford Motor Company (2013)

    The Superior Court reversed the trial court's orders opening and vacating the judgment entered for Ford, Abex and Honeywell and granting a mistrial, and denied the Webbers' motion to quash, so the defense judgment stood…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 29, 2011

    Adams v. Ford Motor Company (2011)

    …so Ford Motor Company keeps its award of costs including $167,570 in expert witness fees after its defense verdict. A prevailing defendant's section 998 offer is presumed reasonable when it wins a more favorable…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 30, 2010

    Russell v. Ford Motor Company (2010)

    The Court of Appeal affirmed the jury's liability and damages findings against Ford Motor Company, but vacated the judgment and remanded so Ford's counsel could review the settlement agreements before a new judgment was…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · December 28, 2018

    Michel v. Ford Motor Company (2018)

    The court granted Cummins's and Ford's motion to exclude plaintiffs' experts Dr. Brody and Dr. Castleman for late disclosure of their reports and denied plaintiffs' motion to amend the scheduling order. Under Rule 37…

  8. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · April 24, 2007

    State EX rel. Ford Motor Company v. Nixon (2007)

    …of Consortium; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Ford Motor Company Claycomo assembly plant; Ford automotive plant in Claycomo, Claycomo worked at the Ford automotive plant Ford automotive plant in Claycomo Claycomo over thirty years until 1996

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 28, 2022

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …of the estate of Robie W. Walls, brought a wrongful death action in federal court in North Carolina against Ford Motor Company and other defendants. The opinion refers to Mr. Walls's Navy service on the…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …ArvinMeritor and Navistar, and loss of consortium was dismissed against Strick and Ford. Under North Carolina law, an asbestos plaintiff can show causation with direct or circumstantial evidence of regular exposure to a defendant's product…

  11. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 19, 2014

    Rost v. Ford Motor Company (2014)

    The Superior Court affirmed the judgment for Richard and Joyce Rost against Ford Motor Company, rejecting Ford's appeal and the Rosts' cross-appeal. Betz v. Pneumo Abex does not bar all 'any exposure' expert opinion…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · October 27, 2016

    Bristol v. Ford Motor Company (2016)

    …is presumed to have acted in good faith, and the defendant did not rebut that presumption. Venue, Removal and Transfer; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Ford dealership mechanic at a Ford dealership Ford dealership 1972-1989

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 7, 2019

    Michel v. Ford Motor Company (2019)

    The court denied Cummins Inc.'s and Ford Motor Company's joint motion for summary judgment, so the plaintiffs (Michel's survivors) keep their claims against both defendants. Plaintiffs must show exposure to asbestos from the…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · April 27, 2012

    Pease v. Ford Motor Company (2012)

    The district court adopted the Special Master's report, rejected Crane Company's objections, and denied Crane's second motion for summary judgment, so the plaintiffs' claims against Crane continued. A transferee MDL court's earlier…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · September 27, 2021

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2021)

    Laura Walls sued Ford, Pneumo Abex and other companies on behalf of the estate of her husband, Robie Walls, and for her own loss of consortium. She alleged that exposure to their asbestos-containing products caused…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 5, 2017

    Petitpas v. Ford Motor Company (2017)

    …of Appeal affirmed the judgment for Exxon Mobil, Ford and Rossmoor, rejecting plaintiffs' challenges to the summary adjudication for Exxon, the nonsuit for Rossmoor, the jury instructions on Ford, and the defense verdict for Exxon. An…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · September 30, 2022

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …and as executor of her late husband Robie Walls's estate, brought claims for his wrongful death from mesothelioma against Ford Motor Company and other defendants. This opinion decides one evidence motion by defendant Pneumo Abex…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Utah · September 9, 2014

    Anderson v. Ford Motor Company (2014)

    Joseph Anderson, Jr. sued in Utah state court, alleging he had asbestos-caused mesothelioma. The case was removed to federal court and transferred to the asbestos multidistrict litigation in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Mr. Anderson died of…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 28, 2018

    Michel v. Ford Motor Company (2018)

    Victor Michel, a Louisiana citizen, sued many companies in state court in 2017 after being diagnosed with mesothelioma. He had worked from 1965 to 2005 as a parts delivery driver, truck mechanic, generator service technician and…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Utah · February 28, 2014

    Anderson v. Ford Motor Company (2014)

    Joseph Anderson Jr. sued in state court, and the case was removed to federal court in Utah. He alleged asbestos-caused mesothelioma and died of it in 2008. His wife Arva Anderson, as executor, took over as plaintiff. After the case returned from the…