135 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 4 of 7
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013
Ford Motor Co. v. Boomer (2013)
The Supreme Court of Virginia reversed the jury verdict and judgment for the estate against Ford and Honeywell (Bendix) because of the "substantial contributing factor" jury instructions, and remanded for further proceedings under a multiple-sufficient…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 24, 2002
Vaughn v. Ford Motor Co. (2002)
The court of appeals affirmed the take-nothing judgment for Ford, General Motors, Daimler Chrysler, Allied Signal, Borg-Warner and Uniroyal, holding the exclusion of plaintiff's experts was an abuse of discretion but harmless because…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · February 20, 1996
Estate of Orecny v. Ford Motor Co. (1996)
The appeals court reversed the trial court's order granting Ford Motor Company's Civ.R. 60(B) motion to vacate the settlement, held that the settlement did not abate on the widow's death, and…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · September 7, 2017
Heaton v. Ford Motor Co. (2017)
Paul Heaton, as executor of the estate of Robert Brawley, sued several companies, including McCord Corporation, alleging that Brawley's mesothelioma and death resulted from asbestos exposure. Against McCord, he claimed Brawley was exposed while repairing…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · September 27, 2019
Ratcliff v. American Honda Motor Co. Inc. (2019)
The magistrate judge recommended granting summary judgment to Ford, Brenntag Specialties, Whittaker Clark & Daniels and Honeywell because Ratcliff's claims were time-barred, and recommended terminating the other pending motions as moot. Under North Carolina law…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · August 28, 2024
Day v. 3M Company Inc. (2024)
…Island Superior Court denied summary judgment to Ford Motor Company and to Graybar Electric Company, so the estate's claims against both go forward, and it also denied Ford's motion for partial entry of separate…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · July 23, 2018
Ratcliff v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2018)
The magistrate judge recommended granting Ford Motor Company's and Hennessy Industries' renewed motions and dismissing the fraud count (Count 8) against them, leaving the plaintiff's other claims in place. A fraud claim must plead…
-
Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 10, 2022 · in the opinion
Sinyard v. Georgia Power Company (2022)
…to create a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Sinyard was aware of the specific health hazards posed by working with asbestos and the presence and location of asbestos in Ford's Hapeville plant…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 8, 2010
Reaser v. AW Chesterton Company (2010)
Robert Reaser served in the Navy from 1951 to 1971, working as a pipefitter and welder on Navy vessels, including time in San Diego and Long Beach. He later lived in Florida and worked in construction and on automobiles. He was diagnosed with…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 15, 2023
Munna v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2023)
Joseph Munna sued American Honda, many other vehicle and parts companies, and others over lung cancer he attributed to asbestos. This decision did not address liability. Munna asked the New York County Supreme Court to try…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · March 29, 2010
Asbury v. AW Chesterton Company (2010)
Carlie Asbury, diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2006, and her husband Thomas sued thirty defendants in Rhode Island Superior Court in 2007. They alleged she was exposed to asbestos in Iowa, Colorado and Wyoming. In Iowa she swept dust and debris in…
-
Court case · Michigan Supreme Court · July 25, 2007
In re Certified Question From the Fourteenth District Court OF Appeals OF Texas (2007)
…appeals court in the negative, holding that Ford owed no duty to Carolyn Miller, which favored Ford and went against the Miller plaintiffs' $9.5 million Texas verdict theory. Under Michigan law, a duty depends on…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · March 24, 2022
Marino v. Abex Corporation (2022)
The Appellate Division affirmed the judgment for plaintiff Deborah Marino against Ford Motor Company, upholding the discovery sanctions; it found one hearsay ruling erroneous but harmless. A trial court may sanction a party for violating a…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana · March 27, 2014
Hayes v. Asbestos, Corp., Ltd. (2014)
…Ford Motor Company's Rule 12(b)(6) motion, holding that the Louisiana Products Liability Act was the plaintiffs' exclusive remedy against Ford and dismissing the non-LPLA claims and the punitive damages claim against Ford…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · November 1, 2018
Dickens v. A-1 Auto Parts & Repair, Inc. (2018)
The court granted Ford Motor Company's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' alternative-causation claims with prejudice and their fraud, concealment and aiding-and-abetting conspiracy claims without prejudice, and allowed the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 25, 2019
Johansen v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
The magistrate judge recommended granting Ford Motor Company's summary judgment motion on the negligence, failure-to-warn and punitive damages claims, because Johansen's brake exposure was de minimis and Ford owed no duty to…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · February 28, 2017
Mtr OF Nyc Asbestos Litig. (2017)
The Appellate Division affirmed the judgment for Ford Motor Company, upholding the trial court's order setting aside the jury's verdict for plaintiff Mary Juni, and dismissed the appeal from the order as subsumed in…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · February 21, 2017
Fish v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2017)
The magistrate judge granted in part and denied in part Ford Motor Company's motion for a protective order limiting the plaintiffs' 54 Rule 30(b)(6) areas of inquiry, largely for Ford, allowed the plaintiffs…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas · December 21, 2018
Thomas v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec LLC (2018)
The court granted summary judgment to Ford, Honeywell and Abex on the breach of warranty claims and granted Abex's motion in part on market share liability, but denied summary judgment on all other claims, including…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 8, 2016
Lepore v. Kelsey-Hayes Co. (2016)
The Court of Appeal reversed summary judgment for Ford, Navistar and Kelsey-Hayes, finding triable issues on whether Lepore was exposed to asbestos from their products, and affirmed summary judgment for Gibbs International. A plaintiff in…