103 results for “General Electric”, page 5 of 6
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 30, 2010 · in the opinion
Russell v. Ford Motor Company (2010)
…if not all, of the cars he worked on were made by Ford, General Motors or Chrysler. As part of his duties, he used an air compressor to blow the dirt off the outside of the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · September 27, 2021 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2021)
…as already mentioned, Rule 26 provides two exceptions to the general rule that a party may not obtain discovery from another party's consulting expert: "(i) as provided in Rule 35(b); or (ii) on showing…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 11, 2018 · in the opinion
Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Coates (2018)
…PROCEEDINGS Until it closed in 1989, Marcantoni was a Baltimore-based general construction contracting company that specialized in highway and utility work for local governments in the greater Baltimore area. Its headquarters was located on Broening…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
…the direct and circumstantial evidence discussed herein — including general causation expert testimony to which ZF has not objected — is sufficient on its own to create a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Strick's…
-
Court case · New York Court of Appeals · November 27, 2018 · in the opinion
Juni v. Ford Motor Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…evidence, a connection between defendant Ford Motor Company's products and decedent's exposure to asbestos. I do not address any other issues of general or specific causation reached by the Appellate Division. [\1119] Wilson, J…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · October 16, 2006 · in the opinion
McPhee v. Ford Motor Company (2006)
…s mesothelioma: \[Ms. Leeper\]: Will you be offering any specific opinions at trial regarding the causal relationship between Ms. McPhee's alleged indirect exposure to General Motors or Ford asbestos-containing products and her alleged mesothelioma? . …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
…in 1974 by prohibiting the use of compressed air for cleaning purposes except when reduced to a slow speed and paired with personal protective equipment. Hand and Portable Powered Tools and Equipment, General, 39 Fed. Reg…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · August 8, 2018 · in the opinion
Richards v. Copes-Vulcan (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…that relief from a judgment or order may be granted under certain limited circumstances, including where there is "excusable neglect." As a general proposition, the party seeking relief under Rule 60(b) must establish that: 1…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 23, 2019 · in the opinion
Michel v. Ford Motor Co. (2019)
…DISCUSSION In their amended complaint, plaintiffs have alleged claims against Ford for: (1) general negligence under Louisiana Civil Code article 2315; (2) employer liability in Ford's capacity as Victor Michel's employer under Louisiana Revised…
-
Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · June 17, 2021 · in the opinion
Sheets v. Ford Motor Co. (2021)
…Act. KRS 342.690 includes no such provision. This stands in stark contrast to other instances in which our General Assembly has expressly provided for a right to an immediate appeal in certain situations. Some examples…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · September 27, 2019 · in the opinion
Ratcliff v. American Honda Motor Co. Inc. (2019)
…publication databases that she had access to as part of her position as a nurse. Plaintiff recalled that researching WDPM led her to "general mesothelioma sites that had discussion about asbestos and causes." (J. Ratcliff Dep…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · March 29, 2010 · in the opinion
Asbury v. AW Chesterton Company (2010)
…Forum Non Conveniens 1 Standard of Review The doctrine of forum non conveniens allows "a court \[to\] resist imposition upon its jurisdiction even when jurisdiction is authorized by the letter of a general venue statute." Kedy…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 14, 2003 · in the opinion
Cossman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (2003)
…28, 61 Cal.Rptr.2d 518.) Section 361 Requires Application of Indiana Law In general, whether a claim is barred by a statute of limitations "is a procedural matter governed by the law of the forum…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 25, 2019 · in the opinion
Johansen v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
…Holdings, 198 P.3d 493 (Wash. 2008) recognized the general rule that "a manufacturer does not have an obligation to warn of the dangers of another manufacturer's product." Braaten, 198 P.3d at 501. Therefore…
-
Court case · Michigan Court of Appeals · January 13, 1998 · in the opinion
Beaudrie v. Anchor Packing Co. (1998)
…scheme, which is "to provide the opportunity for full recovery by each and thereby place the liability for the injury and the resulting cost upon the negligent party." Franges v. General Motors Corp., 404 Mich. 590…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 21, 2020 · in the opinion
Michel v. Ford Motor Company (2020)
…slightly weighs this factor in favor of allowing the amendment. Next, the Court considers the importance of the amendment. In general, under Louisiana law, the owner or operator of a facility has the duty of exercising…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 28, 2019 · in the opinion
Jack v. Dco, LLC (2019)
…both companies. (Id.) C. The Jury's Verdict The court provided the jury a general verdict form on which the jury was asked whether Plaintiffs proved their strict liability design defect, strict liability failure-to-warn…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 13, 2015 · in the opinion
Frank v. Honeywell International Inc. (2015)
…Frank's second or third arguments. II. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 sets forth the general scope of discovery in civil suits: "Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 6, 2020 · in the opinion
Schrank v. Amchem Prods., Inc. (2020)
…increased risk for lung cancer among vehicle mechanics. This is with the caveat that since smoking rates amongst vehicle mechanics are much higher compared to the general population, studies that do no account for the effect…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 17, 2018 · in the opinion
Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2018)
…and consortium. Id. \[25\] The Green court recognized a narrow exception to the general rule against recovery for premarital injuries in toxic exposure cases, where the injured spouse does not or cannot know of the injury…