No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

9 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 25, 2022

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …Dr. Holstein, was qualified to testify on general and specific causation. It had noted that a tissue digestion study by Dr. Gordon weighed against the reliability of his analyses but did not change his methodology or…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 25, 2022

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …cited apply the same substantial-factor test the court had used. It noted that its later Daubert order allowed three other experts to give general causation testimony, and two of them to give specific causation testimony…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · April 30, 2021 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2021)

    In response, CRA asserted the following general objections: CRA objects to the Notice to the extent that its definitions are ambiguous, vague, unduly burdensome, harassing, overly broad, and/or impose any burden beyond the discovery obligations…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 11, 2022 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …motion is GRANTED with respect to Finkelstein's testimony concerning specific causation. Defendants' motion is DENIED with respect to Finkelstein's testimony concerning general causation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Testimony…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · September 27, 2021 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2021)

    …as already mentioned, Rule 26 provides two exceptions to the general rule that a party may not obtain discovery from another party's consulting expert: "(i) as provided in Rule 35(b); or (ii) on showing…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …the direct and circumstantial evidence discussed herein — including general causation expert testimony to which ZF has not objected — is sufficient on its own to create a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Strick's…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …in 1974 by prohibiting the use of compressed air for cleaning purposes except when reduced to a slow speed and paired with personal protective equipment. Hand and Portable Powered Tools and Equipment, General, 39 Fed. Reg…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · September 27, 2019 · in the opinion

    Ratcliff v. American Honda Motor Co. Inc. (2019)

    …publication databases that she had access to as part of her position as a nurse. Plaintiff recalled that researching WDPM led her to "general mesothelioma sites that had discussion about asbestos and causes." (J. Ratcliff Dep…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 28, 2022 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …. which of Defendants' experts offer the challenged general causation opinion." (Id. at 30.) The Court did not have the benefit of knowing which experts seek to testify that exposure to vehicle friction products categorically cannot cause…