8 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 22, 2010
Adamson v. General Elec. Co. (2010)
…Garlock, CBS/Westinghouse, General Electric and Union Carbide (no proof of exposure to their asbestos products), against the estate's executor. To survive summary judgment, a plaintiff must present evidence that the defendant's asbestos-containing…
-
Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · December 16, 2010
Certainteed Corporation v. Dexter (2010)
…Premises Owner Liability; Fault, Apportionment and Settlement Credits; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: General Electric plant (Mount Vernon), Mount Vernon pipefitter General Electric plant (Mount Vernon) Mount Vernon 1969-1971; pipefitter 1963-1964; pipefitter 1946-1984
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · January 28, 2010 · in the opinion
Corley v. Long-Lewis, Inc. (2010)
…Elliot Turbomachinery Co., 545 F.Supp.2d 1266, 1273 (S.D.Fla.2008) (citing Nesbiet v. General Electric Co., 399 F.Supp.2d 205, 212 (S.D.N.Y.2005)). Although these arguments may undermine the…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2006 · in the opinion
John Crane, Inc. v. Puller (2006)
…and found that it contained asbestos. Dr. Longo's testing of the gaskets involved using a wire brush or an electric wire brush to clean a flange surface. The measuring equipment revealed that significant amounts of…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · November 4, 2005 · in the opinion
Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC v. Little (2005)
…Commonwealth, 253 Va. 180, 182, 482 S.E.2d 810, 811-12 (1997); Mizenko v. Electric Motor & Contracting Co., 244 Va. 152, 156, 419 S.E.2d 637, 640 (1992) (citing East River S.S. Corp…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · September 28, 2011 · in the opinion
Moeller v. Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC (2011)
…creates "\such a risk' of an accident of the general nature of the one in question \that an ordinarily prudent company engaged in the manufacture' of such a product \would not have put it on the…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · July 18, 2011 · in the opinion
Yankee v. APV North America, Inc. (2011)
…We hold that the general rule that there is no duty under common law products liability or negligence principles to warn of the dangers of exposure to asbestos in other manufacturers' products applies with regard to…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · September 28, 2005 · in the opinion
Lindstrom v. AC Product Liability Trust (2005)
…a plaintiff is no longer required to show substantial exposure. The Stark opinion and general logic may suggest that, where an expert witness can testify unequivocally that a defendant's product was the source of the…