No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

3 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · March 6, 2009 · in the opinion

    Cardinal Industrial Insulation Co., Inc. v. Norris (2009)

    \[1\] The Complaint named as Defendants: Cardinal Industrial Insulation Company, Inc.; Triangle Insulation and Sheetmetal Co.; General Electric Company; ACandS Inc.; Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC; Anchor Packing; John Crane, Inc.; Combustion Engineering, Inc.; RapidA-merican Corporation…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 27, 2005

    DeMeyer v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (Matter of Asbestos Litig, 2005)

    …York applies the Frye general acceptance standard rather than Daubert; once the challenger makes a prima facie showing that an expert's methodology is not generally accepted, the proponent must prove general acceptance by a fair…

  3. Court case · New York Court of Appeals · June 27, 2007 · in the opinion

    Reynolds v. Garlock Sealing Technologies (Mtr OF Eighth Jud. Dist. Asbestos Litigation, 2007)

    …441, 444 \[Utah 1989\]; Ratterree v Bartlett, 238 Kan 11, 29, 707 P2d 1063, 1076 \[1985\]; General Motors Corp. v Lahocki, 286 Md 714, 723-733, 410 A2d 1039, 1044-1048 \[1980\]; Ward v Ochoa, 284…