12 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 8, 2014 · in the opinion
Krauss v. Trane US Inc. (2014)
…Inc., f/k/a Kewanee Boiler Corporation; Owens-Illinois Inc., individually and as successor in interest to Owens-Illinois Glass Company; Rapid-American Corporation f/k/a Glen Alden Corporation, individually and as successor-by-merger…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · October 3, 2014 · in the opinion
Haldaman v. Eaton Corporation (2014)
…the records in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and resolve any doubts as to the existence of a genuine issue of material fact against the moving party." Burger v. Owens Illinois, Inc.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · October 5, 2004 · in the opinion
Chicano v. General Electric Company (2004)
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 729 A.2d 614, 619-21 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1999) (applying the heeding presumption). "\[I\]n cases where warnings or instructions are required to make a product non-defective and a warning…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 1, 2012 · in the opinion
Vedros v. Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc. (2012)
…asserted the government contractor defense as a colorable defense. Hagen, 739 F. Supp. 2d at 776 (citing Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d Cir. 1998)); see also Jefferson Cnty. v…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 19, 2015 · in the opinion
Wygant v. General Electric Company (2015)
…an attempt to remove some of the uncertainty surrounding when an affected person had sufficient knowledge to start the running of the statute of limitations. See Trieschock v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Co., 354 Pa.Super. 263…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 15, 2023 · in the opinion
Warrington v. 3M Company (2023)
…any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.'" Wright v. Owens Corning, 679 F.3d 101…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · June 3, 2011 · in the opinion
Rabatin v. Allied Glove Corp. (2011)
…Brief at 14. Rabatin does not direct us to any Pennsylvania authority in support of this argument, but does cite to one case from a Florida appellate court, Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. Corcoran, 679 So…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 25, 2018 · in the opinion
Kraus v. Alcatel-Lucent (2018)
…that they do not have any burden to offer evidence demonstrating federal jurisdiction until the plaintiff challenges jurisdiction in a motion to remand. Dart Cherokee Basin Op. Co. v. Owens, 135 S. Ct. 547, 553 (2014)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · September 24, 2010 · in the opinion
Hagen v. Benjamin Foster Co. (2010)
…a colorable federal defense; and (4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · November 9, 2021 · in the opinion
Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)
…of such a nature as to raise a reasonable inference that \[s\]he inhaled asbestos fibers that emanated from it.'" Wilson, 807 A.2d at 923 (quoting Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 1999 Pa. Super…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · February 15, 2022
Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2022)
…as employer of an independent contractor. Under Pennsylvania law, a landowner owes no duty to an independent contractor's employee for a danger the contractor knows of, and the retained-control and peculiar-risk exceptions did…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 1, 2012 · in the opinion
Conner v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2012)
…now holds that, under maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute.