No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

5 results for “Ford Motor Company”

  1. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · August 24, 2009

    General Motors Corporation v. Grenier (2009)

    …Court affirmed the $2 million jury verdict for Grenier against Ford, upholding the trial court's admission of Grenier's expert causation testimony after remand and rejecting Ford's other claims of error. A trial court…

  2. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · February 4, 2009 · in the opinion

    General Motors Corporation v. Grenier (2009)

    GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendants Below, Appellants, v. ROLAND LEO GRENIER, SR., Plaintiff Below, Appellee. Nos. 453, 2007, 578, 2007 Submitted: October 29, 2008. Decided: February 4, 2009. Supreme Court of Delaware Christian…

  3. Court case · Michigan Court of Appeals · January 11, 2007

    Chapin v. A & L Parts, Inc. (2007)

    …Ford, General Motors and Honeywell lost their challenge to the Chapins' expert evidence (one judge dissented). A trial court acting as gatekeeper under MRE 702 and MCL 600.2955(1) need not resolve genuine scientific disputes…

  4. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · April 8, 2009

    Grenier v. General Motors Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2009)

    …despite factual errors in its earlier opinion, it properly denied General Motors' and Ford's motion to exclude plaintiffs' general causation expert testimony, so Grenier's experts remained admissible. A plaintiff's expert need not disprove…

  5. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 30, 2010

    Betz v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2010)

    The Superior Court reversed the trial court's summary judgment for Allied Signal and Ford (and the other friction product defendants) and remanded, holding that the trial court wrongly granted the defendants' Frye motion excluding the…