No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

7 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 10, 2018 · in the opinion

    Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2018)

    …is what the Court of Appeals has "termed a \bystander,' in that he did not work directly with the asbestos products but was in the vicinity of where such products were used." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp…

  2. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 26, 2018 · in the opinion

    Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2018)

    …is what the Court of Appeals has "termed a \bystander,' in that he did not work directly with the asbestos products but was in the vicinity of where such products were used." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 27, 2009 · in the opinion

    Mahoney v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2009)

    …the reasons set forth below. A. Causation GP contends that plaintiffs failed to introduce evidence sufficient to satisfy the "substantial factor" standard of causation set forth in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th…

  4. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 4, 2011

    Robertson v. Doug Ashy Building Materials, Inc. (2011)

    …at issue, and circumstantial evidence that a manufacturer bought the supplier's asbestos can create a fact question on exposure. A raw-asbestos supplier also owes the general duty of reasonable care. Causation; Product Identification; Expert…

  5. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 20, 2012

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Fields (2012)

    …the plaintiff's injury; inference, unverified allegations, or settled status alone are not enough. An employer owes no duty for take-home exposure, so it bears no allocable fault. Causation; Product Identification; Expert Testimony; Take-Home…

  6. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 3, 2019 · in the opinion

    Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2019)

    …permissible to inform a jury that a co-defendant to the asbestos lawsuit had been dismissed when a remaining defendant "opens the door" by introducing evidence relating to the earlier presence of that now-dismissed party…

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 8, 2012 · in the opinion

    Adler v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2012)

    …Specifically, he alleges exposure to asbestos-containing boilers, furnaces, pumps, valves, steam traps, baker ovens, gaskets, and other items. Mr. Wexler was diagnosed with lung cancer on May 12, 2011. He is currently sixty-eight years…