52 results for “General Electric”, page 2 of 3
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · December 16, 2015 · in the opinion
In re All Matters Related TO North American Refractories Company (2015)
…steel, aluminum, and glass manufacturing and electric power production industries. 4.7(b)(3) Exposure Evidence. The NARCO Asbestos Trust may consider as evidence an affidavit of the claimant, an affidavit of one or more Co…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 31, 2002
In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2002)
Tens of thousands of people sued in state courts across the country, claiming that asbestos in friction products such as brake pads gave them or their relatives mesothelioma, lung, laryngeal or esophageal cancer, or asbestosis. They sued makers and…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · November 19, 2013
Lemberger v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2013)
Colleen Lemberger sued Honeywell and other companies for the wrongful death of her husband Steven. As a young man he worked about a year as a parts driver at an auto parts store in Milwaukee, where the job allegedly involved shaping…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 14, 2019
Mettias v. The Pep Boys Manny, Moe & Jack of California (Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2019)
…refusal to give general negligence instructions and the misstatements in reading the instructions caused no prejudicial error. A party is entitled to instructions on every theory supported by substantial evidence, but not to general negligence instructions…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 1, 2023
Haeck v. 3M Company (2023)
…removal. The court agreed. Under Ninth Circuit precedent (Self v. General Motors), a case becomes removable only through a voluntary act by the plaintiff. Because the summary judgment for Allied Fluid was involuntary from Plaintiffs' perspective…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · October 31, 2022
In re All Matters Related TO North American Refractories Company (2022)
…or the common law. The court found nothing improper in parties redacting exhibits they chose to introduce. It added that, even if access applied, it would have been limited to claimant names and general medical condition.
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 15, 2011 · in the opinion
Rodarmel v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2011)
DR. MURPHY: On general principles. You know you can produce a fibrosis, and the possibility of occasional cancer must also come into the picture. But I don't believe that this information would be of any…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 1, 2022 · in the opinion
Labarre v. Bienville Auto Parts Inc. (2022)
…1980s and 1990s) raising the question of Bienville's general knowledge about the dangers of asbestos-containing products.\[63\] Because there is at least some evidence that Bienville knew or should have known that the products…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · December 8, 2022 · in the opinion
In re All Matters Related TO North American Refractories Company (2022)
…therefore, the Trust would have the burden of showing why this general principle should be set aside in this particular instance. The Trust has not cited to any authority in support of its position and the…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 29, 2012 · in the opinion
Dixon v. Ford Motor Company (2012)
…we agree with Ford's contention that "case reports" and other anecdotal evidence are not probative of either general or actual causation,\[14\] but we must point out that Ford severely overstates the strength of its…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · April 4, 2017 · in the opinion
Hart v. Honeywell International (2017)
…found by an Ohio appellate court to be less complex than necessary to trigger the need for an expert witness in a design defect case. Atkins v. General Motors, 132 Ohio App. 3d 556 (Ohio Ct…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · September 5, 2018 · in the opinion
Alexander v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2018)
…This argument misses the mark. It is not "brake dust" in general that is being blamed as the causative agent in this case, but the asbestos particles contained in the Bendix brake dust from the relevant…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 13, 2021 · in the opinion
Vanni v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2021)
…Dr. Horn could not give the likelihood of someone in the general population just developing pericardial mesothelioma without exposure to asbestos. He estimates it would be some fraction of the eight. After listening to the testimony…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 11, 2012 · in the opinion
Gaskill v. Abex Corporation (2012)
…Defendants-Respondents, and AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR COMPANY, INC., BORG-WARNER CORPORATION c/o Burns International Services Corporation; CHRYSLER CORPORATION, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, GENUINE PARTS COMPANY, MARTIN CHRYSLER, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., TOYOTA MOTOR MFG. NORTH AMERICA…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Nevada · February 23, 2005 · in the opinion
Knutson v. Allis-Chalmers Corp. (2005)
…1998). The doctrine serves as an exception to the general rule that a court must rely solely on the face of the complaint to determine if complete diversity between the plaintiffs and defendants is present. Id…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 31, 2015 · in the opinion
Bell v. Abb Group, Inc. (2015)
…person's expertise. Generalized knowledge of a particular subject will not necessarily enable an expert to testify as to a specific subset of the general field of the expert's knowledge. Martinez v. Sakurai Graphic Sys…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · April 4, 2016 · in the opinion
Smith v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2016)
…modifications, or alterations; the likely awareness of users of the risks whether that awareness is based on warnings, general knowledge, or otherwise; design compliance with applicable government standards; extent to which labeling conformed to applicable government…
-
Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · October 24, 2017 · in the opinion
Continental Insurance Company v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2017)
…FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, FIRST STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, FREMONT INDEMNITY COMPANY (f/k/a INDUSTRIAL INDEMNITY COMPANY), GENERAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION, HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY (f/k/a INTERNATIONAL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY), LEXINGTON INSURANCE…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 31, 2012 · in the opinion
Menssen v. Pneumo Abex Corporation (2012)
…signatory to the Saranac Agreement.) Abex received a copy of the 1948 Saranac report from Vandiver Brown, Johns-Manville's general counsel. Brown requested the nine financing companies meet in the Johns-Manville boardroom November 11…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 9, 2009 · in the opinion
Bourque v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2009)
…Kuchler, Polk, Schell, etal., New Orleans, LA, for Defendants/Appellees, General Motors, Ford Motor Company. Court composed of JIMMIE C. PETERS, MARC T. AMY and MICHAEL G. SULLIVAN, Judges. AMY, Judge. Former employee and wife brought…