52 results for “General Electric”, page 3 of 3
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 2, 2016 · in the opinion
Unterleitner v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2016)
…19, 2010) ("\[S\]ettlement is insufficient to confer removal jurisdiction where the formal dismissal of the non-diverse defendant has not yet been entered.") (citations omitted); Guerrero v. General Motors Corp., 392 F. Supp. 2d 1133…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · June 9, 2014 · in the opinion
Mohler v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)
…a)(1).\[1\] Plaintiff now seeks remand of this matter, arguing that the statute does not apply. STANDARD In general, any civil action filed in state court may be removed to the district court if this…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 28, 2015 · in the opinion
McALVEY v. Atlas Copco Compressors, LLC (2015)
…limited to the frequency, regularity and proximity of Plaintiff's exposure to asbestos products in general and his conclusion that Plaintiff experienced a significant exposure to asbestos based on his work activities. Finally, Defendants argue that…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · September 27, 2019 · in the opinion
Ratcliff v. American Honda Motor Co. Inc. (2019)
…publication databases that she had access to as part of her position as a nurse. Plaintiff recalled that researching WDPM led her to "general mesothelioma sites that had discussion about asbestos and causes." (J. Ratcliff Dep…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · October 29, 2008 · in the opinion
Dukes v. Pneumo Abex Corporations (2008)
…study. When Saranac's 1948 report showed findings of cancer and tumors, those companies forced Saranac to remove the references before publication. In 1935, the general counsel of J-M convinced a researcher, Dr. A.J…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · October 9, 2014 · in the opinion
Papp v. Fore-Kast Sales Co., Inc. (2014)
…removal pursuant to Section 1442(a)(1). DISCUSSION I. Federal Officer Removal Jurisdiction A. Legal Standard "\[T\]he general rule that federal courts have an ever present obligation to satisfy themselves of their subject matter jurisdiction. . …
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 22, 2011 · in the opinion
In re Estate OF Holmes v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2011)
…720 N.E.2d at 258. However, a defen-dant who understands the general objectives of the conspiracy, accepts them, and agrees either explicitly or implicitly to further those objectives is liable as a conspirator." Dukes…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 22, 2017 · in the opinion
Smith v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2017)
…Ltd.; BayerCropscience Inc.; Beazer East, Inc; Bird Incorporated; OneBeacon American Insurance Company; Houston General Insurance Company; The Stonewall Insurance Company; First State Insurance Company; American Insurance Company; Home Insurance Company; United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 8, 2020 · in the opinion
Hernandez v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2020)
…2002). The Court must consider if "the plaintiff has any law (statutory, jurisprudential, or arising from the general principles of fault) to support that the defendant owed him a duty." Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · December 13, 2017 · in the opinion
Alexander v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2017)
…are deemed to have been waived, and \[the Sixth Circuit\] will review such objections only to avoid a gross miscarriage of justice. Wiley at 226 (citations omitted). As a general matter, the district judge considering a…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · May 21, 2018 · in the opinion
Conda v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2018)
…causation experts were foundationally reliable and properly admitted" and that "those opinions established a prima facie case of general and specific causation using the legal standard established by the court when trial commenced." The district court…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 30, 2017 · in the opinion
Leech v. 3M Co. (2017)
…the removal statute's unanimity requirement, all defendants removing under the general removal statute must join in or consent to removal if they have been "properly joined and served."\[79\] Here, the parties do not dispute…