No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

5 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 26, 2016 · in the opinion

    Schwartz v. Honeywell Internatl., Inc. (2016)

    …Co. c/o C T Corporation System, Cleveland, OH, for Ford Motor Co. General Electric Corporation, CT Corporation Systems, Cleveland, OH, for General Electric Corporation. Genuine Parts Company c/o Grant Norris SA, Columbus, OH, for…

  2. Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · January 24, 2018 · in the opinion

    Schwartz v. Honeywell Internatl., Inc. (2018)

    …2307.96, the General Assembly demanded a showing greater than an undefined contribution to a total cumulative exposure that resulted in injury. Requiring only that the plaintiff demonstrate that the exposure to asbestos from the defendant…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · April 4, 2017 · in the opinion

    Hart v. Honeywell International (2017)

    …found by an Ohio appellate court to be less complex than necessary to trigger the need for an expert witness in a design defect case. Atkins v. General Motors, 132 Ohio App. 3d 556 (Ohio Ct…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · September 5, 2018 · in the opinion

    Alexander v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2018)

    …This argument misses the mark. It is not "brake dust" in general that is being blamed as the causative agent in this case, but the asbestos particles contained in the Bendix brake dust from the relevant…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · December 13, 2017 · in the opinion

    Alexander v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2017)

    …are deemed to have been waived, and \[the Sixth Circuit\] will review such objections only to avoid a gross miscarriage of justice. Wiley at 226 (citations omitted). As a general matter, the district judge considering a…