No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

22 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · November 19, 2015 · in the opinion

    Estate OF Brust v. Acf Industries, LLC (2015)

    …Westinghouse Electric Corp.; CARRIER CORPORATION; CERTAINTEED CORP., individually and as successor-in-interest to Gustin Bacon; EATON CORPORATION, as successor-in-interest to Eaton Electrical, Inc., and Cutler-Hammer, Inc.; FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION; GENERAL ELECTRIC…

  2. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · September 11, 2019 · in the opinion

    Rowe v. Bell & Gossett Company (2019)

    …successor-in-interest to Victor and Spicer; ECR International, Inc., as successor-in-interest to Dunkirk Radiator Corporation; General Electric Company; General Plumbing Supply, Inc., as successor-in-interest to Ridgewood Corp.; HB Smith Co., Inc.…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 9, 2016 · in the opinion

    Winhauer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)

    …Defendant, represented by Neal C. Glenn, Kelley Jasons McGowan Spinelli & Hanna LLP & Daniel Partick Daly, Kelley Jasons McGowan Spinelli & Hanna LLP. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. Honeywell International Inc…

  4. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · June 29, 2018 · in the opinion

    Rowe v. Bell & Gossett Company (2018)

    …interest to Victor and Spicer; ECR INTERNATIONAL, INC., as successor-in-interest to Dunkirk Radiator Corporation; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; GENERAL PLUMBING SUPPLY, INC., as successor-in-interest to Ridgewood Corp.; HB SMITH CO., INC.; HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL…

  5. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 26, 2016 · in the opinion

    Schwartz v. Honeywell Internatl., Inc. (2016)

    …Co. c/o C T Corporation System, Cleveland, OH, for Ford Motor Co. General Electric Corporation, CT Corporation Systems, Cleveland, OH, for General Electric Corporation. Genuine Parts Company c/o Grant Norris SA, Columbus, OH, for…

  6. Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · January 24, 2018 · in the opinion

    Schwartz v. Honeywell Internatl., Inc. (2018)

    …2307.96, the General Assembly demanded a showing greater than an undefined contribution to a total cumulative exposure that resulted in injury. Requiring only that the plaintiff demonstrate that the exposure to asbestos from the defendant…

  7. Court case · Iowa Court of Appeals · August 31, 2022 · in the opinion

    Fankhauser v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2022)

    …K/A NAPA; BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC; WESTROCK MWV LLC; MIDWEST WHEEL COMPANIES, INC.; NAVISTAR, INC.; MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORPORATION; O'HALLORAN INTERNATIONAL, INC.; LESEY HAYES COMPANY; FORD MOTOR COMPANY; UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION; DEERE & COMPANY; WESTROCK…

  8. Court case · Iowa Court of Appeals · September 21, 2022 · in the opinion

    Fankhauser v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2022)

    …K/A NAPA; BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC; WESTROCK MWV LLC; MIDWEST WHEEL COMPANIES, INC.; NAVISTAR, INC.; MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORPORATION; O'HALLORAN INTERNATIONAL, INC.; LESEY HAYES COMPANY; FORD MOTOR COMPANY; UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION; DEERE & COMPANY; WESTROCK…

  9. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 25, 2013 · in the opinion

    Dixon v. Ford Motor Company (2013)

    …Potomac Electric and held that the General Assembly did not intend for the cap to apply to awards in wrongful death actions. That ruling had a very short shelf life. In its next session, the General…

  10. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 31, 2002

    In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2002)

    Tens of thousands of people sued in state courts across the country, claiming that asbestos in friction products such as brake pads gave them or their relatives mesothelioma, lung, laryngeal or esophageal cancer, or asbestosis. They sued makers and…

  11. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · November 19, 2013

    Lemberger v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2013)

    Colleen Lemberger sued Honeywell and other companies for the wrongful death of her husband Steven. As a young man he worked about a year as a parts driver at an auto parts store in Milwaukee, where the job allegedly involved shaping…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 14, 2019

    Mettias v. The Pep Boys Manny, Moe & Jack of California (Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2019)

    …refusal to give general negligence instructions and the misstatements in reading the instructions caused no prejudicial error. A party is entitled to instructions on every theory supported by substantial evidence, but not to general negligence instructions…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 1, 2022 · in the opinion

    Labarre v. Bienville Auto Parts Inc. (2022)

    …1980s and 1990s) raising the question of Bienville's general knowledge about the dangers of asbestos-containing products.\[63\] Because there is at least some evidence that Bienville knew or should have known that the products…

  14. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 29, 2012 · in the opinion

    Dixon v. Ford Motor Company (2012)

    …we agree with Ford's contention that "case reports" and other anecdotal evidence are not probative of either general or actual causation,\[14\] but we must point out that Ford severely overstates the strength of its…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · April 4, 2017 · in the opinion

    Hart v. Honeywell International (2017)

    …found by an Ohio appellate court to be less complex than necessary to trigger the need for an expert witness in a design defect case. Atkins v. General Motors, 132 Ohio App. 3d 556 (Ohio Ct…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · September 5, 2018 · in the opinion

    Alexander v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2018)

    …This argument misses the mark. It is not "brake dust" in general that is being blamed as the causative agent in this case, but the asbestos particles contained in the Bendix brake dust from the relevant…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 13, 2021 · in the opinion

    Vanni v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2021)

    …Dr. Horn could not give the likelihood of someone in the general population just developing pericardial mesothelioma without exposure to asbestos. He estimates it would be some fraction of the eight. After listening to the testimony…

  18. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 11, 2012 · in the opinion

    Gaskill v. Abex Corporation (2012)

    …Defendants-Respondents, and AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR COMPANY, INC., BORG-WARNER CORPORATION c/o Burns International Services Corporation; CHRYSLER CORPORATION, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, GENUINE PARTS COMPANY, MARTIN CHRYSLER, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., TOYOTA MOTOR MFG. NORTH AMERICA…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · April 4, 2016 · in the opinion

    Smith v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2016)

    …modifications, or alterations; the likely awareness of users of the risks whether that awareness is based on warnings, general knowledge, or otherwise; design compliance with applicable government standards; extent to which labeling conformed to applicable government…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · September 27, 2019 · in the opinion

    Ratcliff v. American Honda Motor Co. Inc. (2019)

    …publication databases that she had access to as part of her position as a nurse. Plaintiff recalled that researching WDPM led her to "general mesothelioma sites that had discussion about asbestos and causes." (J. Ratcliff Dep…