18 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 18, 2013 · in the opinion
Gillenwater v. Honeywell Intern., Inc. (2013)
…Owens-Corning's Distribution of Kaylo Manufactured By Owens-Illinois, Followed By Owens-Corning's Purchase of the Kaylo Division ¶ 53 In 1943, Owens-Illinois began operating the pilot plant to manufacture Kaylo. $2,849,000…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · October 29, 2008 · in the opinion
Dukes v. Pneumo Abex Corporations (2008)
…the deposition is sought to be admitted were protected by the presence of a party at the deposition with the opportunity and a similar motive to develop testimony." McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 298 Ill…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 31, 2012 · in the opinion
Menssen v. Pneumo Abex Corporation (2012)
…of two or more persons for the purpose of accomplishing by concerted action either an unlawful purpose or a lawful purpose by unlawful means." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 188 Ill…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 15, 2011 · in the opinion
Rodarmel v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2011)
…McClure, the plaintiffs presented evidence, and the jury was entitled to find, that four asbestos companies (Owens Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Owens-Illinois, UNARCO, and Johns-Manville) all had engaged in the same sorts of wrongful conduct…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 22, 2011 · in the opinion
In re Estate OF Holmes v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2011)
…extend "liability for a tortious act beyond the active tortfeasor to individuals who have not acted but have only planned, assisted, or encouraged the act." McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 188 Ill. 2d 102, 133…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 31, 2002 · in the opinion
In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2002)
… 1447(d) (emphasis added). We construed that language [\388] in Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124 (3d Cir.1998), where we held that "section 1447(d) prohibits review of remand orders \whether…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana · May 28, 2015 · in the opinion
Hayes v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (2015)
…Dept. of Transp., 618 So.2d 537 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1993) writ denied (La.9/9/93); Fricke v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 618 So.2d 473 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1993); Baldwin v. Kikas…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 9, 2016 · in the opinion
Winhauer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
…is key to a plaintiffs claim. Id. A claim for failure to warn may be based on a theory of negligence or strict liability. O'Flynn v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, 759 So. 2d 526, 535 (Miss…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 1, 2022 · in the opinion
Labarre v. Bienville Auto Parts Inc. (2022)
…When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · October 9, 2014 · in the opinion
Papp v. Fore-Kast Sales Co., Inc. (2014)
…will closely examine and construe the Amended Complaint in determining whether Boeing's removal petition properly establishes the existence of federal jurisdiction. See Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 128 (3d Cir…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 13, 2021 · in the opinion
Vanni v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2021)
…reasonable inference and resolving conflicts in support of the judgment. (Howard v. Owens Corning (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 621, 630). In an asbestos-related injury case, causation involves two elements: exposure and substantial factor causation…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · July 16, 2020
Corley v. Long-Lewis, Inc. (2020)
Charles Corley and his wife Myra sued dozens of companies that allegedly supplied asbestos-containing products that caused his malignant mesothelioma. The opinion says he used the products in the Navy and later as a self-employed mechanic and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 29, 2011
Corley v. Bill Vann Co. (In re Liability Litigation, 2011)
The executor of Charles Corley's estate sued a group of companies in Alabama state court under the Alabama Wrongful Death Act. Mr. Corley had died of mesothelioma in October 2009. The case was removed to federal court and then sent to the asbestos…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 28, 2015
McALVEY v. Atlas Copco Compressors, LLC (2015)
Gerald McAlvey sued Atlas Copco Compressors and other companies in federal court in southern Illinois over asbestos exposure. The opinion refers to his asbestosis. He served in the U.S. Navy from 1954 to 1958 aboard the USS Bremerton, USS Roosevelt…
-
Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · October 24, 2017 · in the opinion
Continental Insurance Company v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2017)
In Owens-Illinois the Court acknowledged that "\[i\]f, after experience, we are convinced that our solution is inefficient or unrealistic, we will not hesitate to revisit" the allocation paradigm with its continuous-trigger and unavailability…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · November 19, 2013 · in the opinion
Lemberger v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2013)
…LEMBERGER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, BENDIX COMMERCIAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS, LLC, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, OWENS ILLINOIS, INC., WAHL REFRACTORIES, INC., PRICE VIKING, HENNES SERVICES, INC., ZIEN MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · November 19, 2015 · in the opinion
Estate OF Brust v. Acf Industries, LLC (2015)
…established by this record are so few and so limited that they simply fail to meet the "frequency, regularity, and proximity" test. That test was satisfied in Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 186 N.J. 394…
-
Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · January 24, 2018 · in the opinion
Schwartz v. Honeywell Internatl., Inc. (2018)
…R.C. 2307.96(B), the statute provides no definition for the term "substantial factor." This lack of clarity opens the door to inconsistent application of R.C. 2307.96 and gave rise to this appeal. {¶…