Search

• Organization: Honeywell International Inc. ×
• Clear filters

8 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 8, 2010 · in the opinion

   Reaser v. AW Chesterton Company (2010)

   …the forum non conveniens motion can be granted. In that regard, Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753 (Hansen) is instructive. Hansen was an asbestos case with 200 named defendants. (Id…

2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 26, 2022 · in the opinion

   Becnel v. Lamorak Insurance Co. (2022)

   …1986); see also Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 2004-1589 (La. App. 1 Cir. 9/23/05), 923 So. 2d 118, writ denied sub nom. Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 2005-2318 (La. 3…

3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · September 16, 2020 · in the opinion

   Coffin v. Ametek, Inc. (2020)

   …a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked.'" Id. (quoting Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1162-63 (4th Cir…

4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 3, 2016 · in the opinion

   Davis v. Honeywell International Inc. (2016)

   …Karst & Von Oiste and George H. Kim for Plaintiff and Respondent. CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION WILLHITE, Acting P.J. In Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford), the California Supreme Court addressed the…

5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 17, 2017 · in the opinion

   Phillips v. Honeywell International Inc. (2017)

   …L.Rev. 1153, 1161.) This characteristic underlies our Supreme Court's conclusion in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford) that "\[i\]n an asbestos-related cancer case, the plaintiff need not…

6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 26, 2021 · in the opinion

   Toy v. Honeywell Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)

   …ago. See, e.g., Brodkin Report at 64. Defendant first cites to the California Supreme Court's opinion in Rutherford v. Owens Illinois, Inc., regarding the proof of causation required in asbestos-related cases. 16 Cal…

7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 10, 2018 · in the opinion

   Hake v. Allied Fluid Products Corp. (2018)

   …was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…

8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2021 · in the opinion

   Toy v. Armstrong Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)

   …that the California Supreme Court has not yet determined whether an "every exposure" theory of liability is consistent with the substantial factor test that applies in asbestos cases. See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal…