6 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 11, 2020 · in the opinion
Booker v. Imerys Talc America, Inc. (2020)
…included in the verdict form because they bear strict liability for his injuries. (See Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1187-1191 \[strict products liability applies to suppliers of raw…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 1, 2023 · in the opinion
Chenet v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (2023)
…Judge. APPEAL DISMISSED; CASE REMANDED. Lindsey A. Cheek, THE CHEEK LAW FIRM, 650 Poydras Street, Suite 2310, New Orleans, LA 70130, Lewis Owens Unglesby, Lance C. Unglesby, Adrian M. Simm, Jr., Jamie F. Gontarek, UNGLESBY LAW…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 22, 2020 · in the opinion
Gibbons v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer (Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2020)
…was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 25, 2017 · in the opinion
Alfaro v. Imerys Talc America Inc. (2017)
…would need to establish that this exposure was to a reasonable medical probability a substantial factor in contributing to any asbestos-related disease she suffered. (See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 2, 2018 · in the opinion
Matter of Crozier v. Avon Prods., Inc. (2018)
…expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · July 16, 2019 · in the opinion
Shook v. Avon Products, Inc. (2019)
…litigation. See J&J Memorandum in Support of Motion to Fix Venue, ECF No. 1-5 at 17 ("Debtors claim that J&J owes them a duty to defend." (citing 1989 Agreement § 11 & 2011 Agreement ¶ 6))…