6 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 4, 2020 · in the opinion
Gaddy v. Taylor Seidenbach, Inc. (2020)
…1. Plaintiffs argue there is no evidence that a product sold by Owens Corning Fiberglass should be attributed to Owens-Illinois. Plaintiffs aver that any suggestion that such an attribution should be made was merely attorney…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Lamson v. Georgia-Pacific LLC (2019)
…more than the presence of asbestos in the workplace; he must prove that he worked in the vicinity of the product's use. Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 729 A.2d 614, 622 (Pa. Super…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 29, 2023 · in the opinion
Ragusa v. Louisiana Guaranty Insurance Association (2023)
…When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion
Bootenhoff v. Hormel Foods Corporation (2014)
…entitled to summary judgment. Products Liability — Duty to Warn Plaintiffs' products liability claim is foreclosed by Tenth Circuit precedent applying Oklahoma law. In Rohrbaugh v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 965 F.2d 844, 847 (10th Cir.
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma · July 30, 2014 · in the opinion
Bootenhoff v. Hormel Foods Corporation (2014)
…accord). The Court finds guidance, however, in Tenth Circuit authority applying Oklahoma law. In Rohrbaugh v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 965 F.2d 844, 847 (10th Cir. 1992) (Rohrbaugh I), the Tenth Circuit held that the…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · July 3, 2012 · in the opinion
Calewarts v. CR Meyer and Sons Company (2012)
…case. It contends the doctrine cannot apply to a safe place violation by a property owner because such claims are not "independent from and unrelated to" the safe place duty the employer also owes the employee…