77 results for “General Electric”, page 3 of 4
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · January 31, 2024
Pelton v. John Crane, Inc. (2024)
…may seek punitive damages. Under maritime law, a plaintiff may show substantial-factor causation through admissible general expert testimony plus circumstantial evidence of substantial exposure over a substantial period, without expert testimony specific to the defendant…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · March 2, 2012
John Crane, Inc. v. Hardick (2012)
…whether under DOHSA, the Jones Act, or general maritime law, and a Navy sailor who contributed to the function of vessels and had a substantial connection to them is a seaman. Arguments not briefed under Rule…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · April 9, 2014
Hasenberg v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2014)
…not make clear which defendants were sued in which counts, the court dismissed it without prejudice and ordered an amended complaint by May 9, 2014. It also noted general personal jurisdiction standards for a later motion.
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · November 5, 1997 · in the opinion
Ciletti v. Raymark Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 1997)
In general, filing a proof of claim would not appear to constitute settlement under § 15-108. The plaintiff's proffer of a release to the defendant has been called "the defining moment of settlement", In re…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion
Roverano v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)
Indeed, I believe that if the General Assembly had intended to do the opposite within the contours of a "Fair Share Act" — i.e., to maintain a liability allocation regime for strict liability cases that was…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 16, 2020 · in the opinion
Clevenger v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)
Marchevsky's answered: So basically as we put in the guidelines, in general, it's difficult to tell a sarcoma mesothelioma from other tumors, which is why we went through the trouble of putting together the…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 18, 2020
Andrews v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)
…and remanded for further proceedings. General maritime law preempts state law for a Navy sailor's asbestos products claims against a gasket maker, and DOHSA does not bar a general maritime survival recovery for the decedent…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · October 24, 2019
Evans v. John Crane, Inc. (2019)
…overruled its objections to the magistrate judge's ruling that plaintiff's Navy procurement expert was qualified. General maritime law and state survival statutes can supply survival damages where an asbestos injury is indivisible across the…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · March 5, 2013 · in the opinion
John Crane, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Company (2013)
…UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES, including Excess Insurance Company, Ltd., General Reinsurance Corporation, River Thames Insurance Company, World Auxiliary Insurance Corporation, and John Does 1 through 400, Defendants, (Allianz Underwriters…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 19, 2019 · in the opinion
Evans v. Imo Industries, Inc. (2019)
…upon by Captain Moore extend to JCI because Captain Moore testified that "these documents are instructive for the general purpose of determining what the Navy's attitude towards warnings was at any particular point in time.…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 28, 2017 · in the opinion
Roverano v. John Crane, Inc. (2017)
…asbestos that caused his lung cancer. However, Dr. Frank testified on this general causation factor and concluded that exposure to asbestos can cause lung cancer. Dr. Gelfand also testified that, based on the medical literature and…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · December 2, 2004 · in the opinion
Lustenring v. AC&S, Inc. (2004)
…which were made with asbestos. Valid expert testimony indicated that such dust, raised from asbestos products and not just from industrial air in general, necessarily contains enough asbestos to cause mesothelioma. Defendant's factual disagreement with…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 13, 2012 · in the opinion
Leonard v. John Crane, Inc. (2012)
…12 Cal.3d 382. Applying general tort principles, the court reasoned that "one who negligently causes a severely disabling injury to an adult may reasonably expect that the injured person is married and that his or…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002 · in the opinion
Crane, Inc. v. Scribner (2002)
…time, can metastasize to other structures, including the diaphragm and the abdominal cavity. Although there is a background rate of mesothelioma in the general population that is not asbestos-related, it is very low. Dr. Samuel…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 23, 2021 · in the opinion
McDaniel v. John Crane, Inc. (2021)
…high known or potential rate of error and whether there are standards controlling the technique's operation," and (4) "\[w\]hether the theory or technique enjoys general acceptance within a relevant scientific community." Kumho Tire Co.…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · June 23, 2009 · in the opinion
Newinski v. John Crane, Inc. (2009)
…1981) (citations omitted). An exception to the general rule of joint and several liability applies when there are "independent consecutive acts of negligence and it is reasonably possible to determine which injuries were caused by which…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 23, 2006 · in the opinion
Barone v. Gatx Corp. (2006)
…of asbestos dust. On February 27, 2003, appellee filed a claim for employer intentional tort and wrongful death against appellant, GATX Corporation ("GATX"), General American Transportation Corporation, the Gage Company, I.U. North America, Inc., Garlock…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2019)
…the general duty of care includes a duty to warn when the manufacturer "knows or has reason to know" that its product "is or is likely to be dangerous for the use for which it is…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 7, 2011 · in the opinion
Kelemen v. John Crane, Inc. (2011)
…erroneous instruction. . . ."'" (Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th 548, 574.) When determining whether an error of instruction and/or instructional omission was prejudicial, the court must evaluate the state of the evidence, the…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · November 15, 2018 · in the opinion
Case v. Clark Indus. Insulation (2018)
…objection instead, and (2) the defense was not available at the time of the response. {¶ 27} JCI inserted general objections to every interrogatory regarding "sales that relate to a period of time, geographical area, or activity…