18 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · September 30, 2015
Hedden v. CBS Corporation (2015)
The court granted summary judgment to Crown Cork & Seal, CBS, General Electric, Gardner Denver, Link-Belt and Riley Power, and denied it to Crane Co. and John Crane, Inc. on the maritime claims, so the Heddens…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · June 3, 2011
Wingfield v. John Crane (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (NO. VI), 2011)
The court granted the Moving Defendants' motion (John Crane, Warren Pumps, General Electric, Georgia-Pacific and Crane Co.) to exclude Emmett Wingfield's videotaped deposition, a ruling against the plaintiff. Under Federal Rule of Evidence 804…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · March 9, 2023 · in the opinion
Deem v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)
…429. Deem appealed. Dkt. 459. Deem's claims against General Electric and CBS were dismissed by stipulation. Dkts. 458 and 465. The Court also dismissed on summary judgment Deem's claims against Defendants Cleaver-Brooks, Dkt…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · September 14, 2007 · in the opinion
John Crane, Inc. v. Jones (2007)
…Dana Corporation; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company; General Electric Company; Foster-Wheeling USA Corporation; Warren Pumps, Inc.; Goulds Pumps, Inc.; Borg-Warner Corporation; Honeywell International, Inc.; Pneumo Abex Corporation; General Motors Corporation; and Genuine Parts Company. None…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · April 25, 2019 · in the opinion
Deem v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
…SCULLY MANSUKHANI LLP & Trevor J. Mohr, GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI LLP. CBS Corporation, formerly known as Viacom Inc., Foster-Wheeler Energy Corporation & General Electric Company, Defendants, represented by Christopher S. Marks, TANENBAUM KEALE LLP & Erin P…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · August 6, 2019 · in the opinion
Deem v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
…Marks, TANENBAUM KEALE LLP, David A. Speziali, SPEZIALI, GREENWALD & HAWKINS, pro hac vice & Erin P. Fraser, TANENBAUM KEALE LLP. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Christopher S. Marks, TANENBAUM KEALE LLP, David A. Speziali, SPEZIALI, GREENWALD…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 13, 2016 · in the opinion
Winhauer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
…Defendant, represented by Neal C. Glenn, Kelley Jasons McGowan Spinelli & Hanna LLP & Daniel Partick Daly, Kelley Jasons McGowan Spinelli & Hanna LLP. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. Honeywell International Inc…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · March 7, 2013 · in the opinion
Joyner v. AC & R. Insulation Co. (2013)
…the weight of the proof presented—that matters." Id. at 782-83. After reviewing the conflicting cases, this court finds the analysis in Hagen cogent and consistent with the general removal standard. 28 U.S.C. …
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 17, 2002 · in the opinion
Andaloro v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (2002)
…Company, Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., Owens Brockway Glass Container, Inc., Studebaker Worthington, Inc., Uniroyal, Inc., Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Inc., WR Grace & Co., Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Fibreboard Corp., GAF Corporation. Appeal of: John Crane, Inc., Appellant…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · February 10, 2005 · in the opinion
Wilson v. John Crane, Inc. (2005)
…that courts consider whether the party seeking the withdrawal or amendment has acted with due diligence. In more general terms, courts should seek to ascertain whether the aggrieved party was careless in not timely filing its…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · November 5, 1997 · in the opinion
Ciletti v. Raymark Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 1997)
In general, filing a proof of claim would not appear to constitute settlement under § 15-108. The plaintiff's proffer of a release to the defendant has been called "the defining moment of settlement", In re…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 3, 2004 · in the opinion
Bartel v. John Crane, Inc. (2004)
…§§ 688, et seq., the General Admiralty and Maritime law, and traditional product liability law. ECF No. 1. Lindstrom claims that he contracted this disease as a result of his work-life exposures to asbestos and asbestos…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · April 27, 2020 · in the opinion
Mullinex v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)
…§ 1333(1) and 46 U.S.C. § 30101 and the general admiralty and maritime law of the United States." ECF No. 1-4 ¶ 7. JCI does not seek to dismiss any particular claim in the Amended…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · April 27, 2022 · in the opinion
Israel v. John Crane, Inc. (2022)
…932 F.2d 413, 415 (5th Cir. 1991) (holding that a cause of action under general maritime law "accrues when a plaintiff has had a reasonable opportunity to discover his injury, its cause, and the link…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · September 28, 2005 · in the opinion
Lindstrom v. AC Product Liability Trust (2005)
…a plaintiff is no longer required to show substantial exposure. The Stark opinion and general logic may suggest that, where an expert witness can testify unequivocally that a defendant's product was the source of the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · September 13, 2022 · in the opinion
Webb v. 3M Company (2022)
…Inc., 200 F.3d 335, 339 (5th Cir. 2000). But unlike the general removal statute, the Court must broadly construe the federal officer removal statute in favor of a federal forum. Williams v. Lockheed Martin Corp.…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · April 29, 2022 · in the opinion
Deem v. William Powell Co. (2022)
…1434 (1997), noted that "twice the Supreme Court has been presented with federal statute of limitations language materially identical to that in the general maritime statute of limitations, and twice the Supreme Court has held that…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 1, 2010 · in the opinion
Crane v. Linkus (2010)
…appellee's motion and entered judgment in the amount requested. Appellant noted an appeal to this Court. General Background Before addressing the causation issue in this case, it may be helpful to place it into context…