No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

15 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · June 2, 1993

    Jackson v. Anchor Packing Co. (1993)

    The Eighth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for all defendants (Owens-Corning, Owens-Illinois, Fibreboard, Keene, Anchor, Chesterton, Garlock, John Crane, Rexnord and Georgia Talc) against the ten Mohawk tire plant workers, because the workers lacked sufficient…

  2. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002

    Crane, Inc. v. Scribner (2002)

    James Scribner, a Navy veteran who later worked for a power company, developed mesothelioma and died in November 1995. He had sued, and his widow and children continued the case, against John Crane, Garlock and others. Scribner testified that in the…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · June 23, 1999

    Lambert v. Babcock & Wilcox Co. (1999)

    Cheryl Lambert sued several companies, including John Crane and W.R. Grace, for the wrongful death of her husband Samuel Lambert. He was diagnosed with mesothelioma in October 1992 and died in March 1993 at age 42. Her original complaint blamed his…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · August 31, 2000 · in the opinion

    Caruolo v. John Crane, Inc. (2000)

    …C and S, Inc., Combustion Engineering, Inc., Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Fibreboard Corporation, U.S. Mineral Products Co., Pittsburgh-Corning Corp., The Flintkote Company, Rockwool Manufacturing Company, Anchor Packing Company, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Rapid-American…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · May 18, 2000 · in the opinion

    Hamilton v. Garlock, Inc. (2000)

    …must bear the burden of establishing the equitable share of culpability attributable to each of the settling defendants. Zalinka v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 221 A.D.2d 830, 633 N.Y.S.2d 884 (1995)…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · March 9, 2023 · in the opinion

    Deem v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)

    …with maritime law, is that the plaintiff show "more than a casual or minimum contact with the product" to hold the defendant liable. Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prod., 69 F.3d 712, 716 …

  7. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2006 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Puller (2006)

    …is made." Thus, we are not \[privileged\] to dissect the evidence and weigh the credibility of its messengers, which is what Crane has asked us to do. See Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · September 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Hedden v. CBS Corporation (2015)

    …later diagnosis of a distinct malignant asbestos-related condition. The diagnosis of a malignant asbestos-related condition creates a new cause of action." Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 601 N.W.2d 627, 630 (Wis…

  9. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 18, 2015 · in the opinion

    Voelker v. John Crane (Matter of Eighth Jud. Dist. Asbestos Litig., 2015)

    …determination. It is noted, that in New York, injury occurs when plaintiff is exposed to asbestos. (see Consorti v Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 86 NY2d 449 (1997); Matter of Eighth Judicial District Asbestos Litig. \[Chrabas\], 273…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · December 29, 1998 · in the opinion

    Ronsini v. Worthington Corp. (Matter Of New York City Asbestos Litigation. Elaine Ronsini V. Garlock, Inc., 1998)

    …settling defendants (see, Bigelow v Acands, Inc., 196 AD2d 436; Zalinka v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 221 AD2d 830, 831), and we decline to disturb the jury's determination as to this, and as to the…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 29, 2013 · in the opinion

    Pfeifer v. John Crane, Inc. (2013)

    …a verdict in favor of that party. \[Citations.\]" (Howard v. Owens Corning (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 621, 629-630 \[85 Cal.Rptr.2d 386\].) The trial court's ruling is reviewed de novo. (Brassinga v…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 18, 2006 · in the opinion

    Weber v. John Crane, Inc. (2006)

    …the defendant with enough frequency and regularity as to show a reasonable medical probability that this exposure was a factor in causing the plaintiff's injuries. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · September 13, 2022 · in the opinion

    Webb v. 3M Company (2022)

    …That statement does not require the removing party to provide evidence. Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co., LLC v. Owens, 574 U.S. 81, 84 (2014) (reversing the Tenth Circuit for abuse of discretion in denying review…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 7, 2011 · in the opinion

    Kelemen v. John Crane, Inc. (2011)

    …defective designs of the other companies' products were legal causes of the plaintiffs' injuries; and the percentage of legal cause attributable to the other companies." (Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · April 9, 2014 · in the opinion

    Hasenberg v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2014)

    …jurisdiction over WCD in Illinois, because WCD is a New Jersey corporation with a Connecticut principal place of business, WCD owns no property in Illinois, WCD has no offices in Illinois, WCD has no employees in…