No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

21 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 18, 2013 · in the opinion

    Gillenwater v. Honeywell Intern., Inc. (2013)

    Bowes told Gardner that Owens-Illinois currently had "in the pilot plant stage" a new type of thermal insulation, "a hydrous calcium silicate," that, when removed from a mold and dried, formed "a porous mass \[that…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · June 2, 1993

    Jackson v. Anchor Packing Co. (1993)

    The Eighth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for all defendants (Owens-Corning, Owens-Illinois, Fibreboard, Keene, Anchor, Chesterton, Garlock, John Crane, Rexnord and Georgia Talc) against the ten Mohawk tire plant workers, because the workers lacked sufficient…

  3. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 1, 2010

    Crane v. Linkus (2010)

    George Linkus, a Baltimore shipyard machinist, was diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma in 2005 and sued John Crane, Inc. and others. He had worked at the Key Highway shipyard from 1952 to 1959, overhauling valves and packing them with dry, powdery…

  4. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 14, 1990

    Bushless v. GAF Corp. (1990)

    Four Babcock & Wilcox workers, Joseph Bushless, Ralph Barber, Lloyd Kelly and Robert Edmond, were diagnosed with asbestosis in 1987. Bushless and Kelly's wives joined their suits. They sued GAF and other makers and suppliers of asbestos products,…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · June 6, 1995 · in the opinion

    Harris v. AC & S, Inc. (1995)

    …Corp., Owens-Illinois Inc. Peter E. Carlson, Kelley Drye & Warren, Chicago, IL, Debra L. Burns, Bose McKinney & Evans, Indianapolis, IN, George E. Purdy, Bose McKinney & Evans, Indianapolis, IN, for Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. Robin L. Babbitt…

  6. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002 · in the opinion

    Crane, Inc. v. Scribner (2002)

    …He sued, claiming that the disease resulted from his exposure to the defendant's products during the period of [\736] 1962-63. Owens-Illinois, advancing the "manifestation" theory, argued that Armstrong's cause of action did…

  7. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Daniels v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. (2019)

    …General Electric, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, and Owens Illinois (herein "settled defendants")) on the jury verdict form. John Crane contends that under the Joint Tortfeasor Contribution Act (Contribution Act) (740 ILCS 100/1 et seq. (West…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 7, 1998 · in the opinion

    ACandS v. Abate (1998)

    …Proc. Code Ann. § 11-108(b) (1995 Repl. Vol; 1997 Cum.Supp.).\[58\] In Owens-Illinois v. Zenobia, 325 Md. 420, 601 A.2d 633 (1992), the Court of Appeals rejected a challenge to a $1…

  9. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 17, 2003 · in the opinion

    Garlock v. Gallagher (2003)

    …for judgment only after it "consider\[s\] all evidence and inferences in the light most favorable to the party against whom the motion is made." Md. Rule 2-519(b); see also Owens-Illinois, Inc. v…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 7, 2011 · in the opinion

    Kelemen v. John Crane, Inc. (2011)

    …defective designs of the other companies' products were legal causes of the plaintiffs' injuries; and the percentage of legal cause attributable to the other companies." (Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · September 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Hedden v. CBS Corporation (2015)

    …maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." Conner v. Alfa Laval…

  12. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · March 6, 2009 · in the opinion

    Cardinal Industrial Insulation Co., Inc. v. Norris (2009)

    …respect to negligence. Inclusion of Rohm & Haas in the apportionment instruction. Norris argues that the trial court committed reversible error by including Rohm & Haas in the apportionment instruction. We disagree. In Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. v…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 23, 2021 · in the opinion

    McDaniel v. John Crane, Inc. (2021)

    …On August 18, 1972, Defendant wrote to Duke Power to confirm that Covil would use "Owens Corning Asbestos Free Calcium Silicate Pipe Covering and Block for the ducts, feed water heaters, and piping where Thermobestos was…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · May 18, 2000 · in the opinion

    Hamilton v. Garlock, Inc. (2000)

    …must bear the burden of establishing the equitable share of culpability attributable to each of the settling defendants. Zalinka v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 221 A.D.2d 830, 633 N.Y.S.2d 884 (1995)…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 2002 · in the opinion

    Hackett v. John Crane, Inc. (2002)

    …packing materials, gaskets, and insulation furnished by many other manufacturers, including Garlock, Owens Corning, and Johns-Manville. Lewis began to exhibit symptoms of lung disease in April 1998. Diagnostic tests indicated that Lewis had mesothelioma, an…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 22, 2021 · in the opinion

    McDaniel v. John Crane, Inc. (2021)

    …must present \evidence of exposure to a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff worked.'" Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · March 9, 2023 · in the opinion

    Deem v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)

    …with maritime law, is that the plaintiff show "more than a casual or minimum contact with the product" to hold the defendant liable. Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prod., 69 F.3d 712, 716 …

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 3, 2004 · in the opinion

    Bartel v. John Crane, Inc. (2004)

    …has suffered damages; and, 3) prove that defendant's asbestos-containing product was a substantial factor in causing his damages. Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 726 F.Supp. 172, 174 (W.D.Mich.1989); Stark…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 13, 2016 · in the opinion

    Winhauer v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)

    …is key to a plaintiffs claim. Id. A claim for failure to warn may be based on a theory of negligence or strict liability. O'Flynn v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, 759 So. 2d 526, 535 (Miss…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · June 9, 2015 · in the opinion

    Nuutinen v. CBS Corporation (2015)

    …whether a union pension or otherwise; and (c) life insurance proceeds. CBS concedes that this evidence is barred by the collateral source rule, unless the plaintiff opens the door for impeachment purposes. Leitinger v. DBart, Inc.…