No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

29 results for “General Electric”, page 2 of 2

  1. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 22, 1989 · in the opinion

    Sholtis v. American Cyanamid Co. (1989)

    …theory of non-identification liability is acceptable in New Jersey. \[9\] The court "reserve\[d\] decision on the general appropriateness of including products with different degrees of risk in a market-share analysis." 116 N.J…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · November 27, 2017 · in the opinion

    Donohue v. CBS Corporation (2017)

    …notices of removal, there are nearly two dozen other defendants involved in this action. As a general matter, "the consent of all defendants in a multiparty case is a precondition to removal." Green v. Nat's…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 16, 2017 · in the opinion

    Charlevoix v. John Crane (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …must "assess the general features of the type of incident involved," to determine whether the incident has "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce\[.\]" Second, a court must determine whether "the general character" of the "activity…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 8, 2017 · in the opinion

    Charlevoix v. Caterpillar, Inc. (2017)

    …must "assess the general features of the type of incident involved," to determine whether the incident has "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce\[.\]" Second, a court must determine whether "the general character" of the "activity…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 27, 2013 · in the opinion

    Jones v. John Crane, Inc. (2013)

    …I.\[4\] Except as to the named defendants, the FAC in Jones II was identical to the Jones I complaint with regard to the language in the general allegations, the first cause of action for negligence…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · July 7, 2017 · in the opinion

    Carroll v. John Crane, Inc. (2017)

    …defendant's broadly-worded motion is GRANTED only as to any general references to the time or money spent defending this lawsuit and as to any references to defendant's wealth during the liability phase of…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · July 13, 2017 · in the opinion

    Carroll v. John Crane, Inc. (2017)

    …IN PART. Plaintiffs' objection to the designations as untimely is denied. In all other respects, the motion is reserved pending plaintiffs' filing of any further general, as well as specific, objections and any counter-designations, which…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 1, 2009 · in the opinion

    Handley v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2009)

    …purpose of judicial construction of a statute is to determine the meaning that comports most closely with the intent of the Legislature "\with the view to promoting rather than defeating the general purpose of the statute…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion

    Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)

    …No. 828 684, Answers of Defendant John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. in Response to General Order No. 29 Interrogatories 6:4-18, 12:4-7). Defendant's gasket sheet materials were "various shades of grey, with Defendant…