16 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · December 2, 2016
Perez v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
The court granted General Electric's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (without prejudice) and denied the motions by Air & Liquid Systems, Warren Pumps and John Crane to dismiss the loss of consortium count…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · October 21, 2022 · in the opinion
Pritt v. John Crane, Inc. (2022)
…County Superior Court in November, 2020 against John Crane, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, General Electric Company and Viacom CBS Inc. John Crane removed the case to this Court in December, 2020. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 8, 2010 · in the opinion
Reaser v. AW Chesterton Company (2010)
…whether substantial evidence supports the trial court's finding that a suitable forum exists. (Guimei v. General Electric Co. (2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 689, 696.) Here appellants claim the lower court erred in finding that…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · April 12, 2017 · in the opinion
Carroll v. Abb, Inc. (2017)
…motion for summary judgment (dkt. \#253) is DENIED. 3) Plaintiff Patricia Carroll's motion to strike (dkt. \#403) is DENIED AS MOOT. 4) Defendants General Electric Company, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, and FMC Corporation are DISMISSED…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · October 21, 2022 · in the opinion
Pritt v. John Crane, Inc. (2022)
…for Middlesex County in November, 2020 against John Crane, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, General Electric Company and Viacom CBS Inc. John Crane removed the case to this Court in December, 2020. Plaintiffs then filed an amended…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · July 11, 2023 · in the opinion
Pritt v. John Crane, Inc. (2023)
…the same plaintiffs who brought the above captioned case, filed suit against Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and General [\121] Electric Company ("GE") (collectively "New York defendants"). Plaintiffs filed the original complaint in the case at bar…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · November 17, 2015 · in the opinion
Stallings v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation (2015)
…526 U.S. 137, 147-49 (1999) (applying Daubert's general principles to the expert matters discussed in Rule 702). First, the Court must determine "whether the experts' testimony reflects \scientific knowledge,' whether their findings are…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 11, 2007 · in the opinion
Cadlo v. Metalclad Insulation Corporation (2007)
…Cadlo's\] contraction of cancer, \[Maxlyn Cadlo\] would have continued her marital relationship with him for another 20 years." (See Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp. (1991) 230 Cal.App.3d 1125, 1152 \[briefs are reliable indications…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · April 5, 2023 · in the opinion
Gemaehlich v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)
…and GRANTS the Gemaehlichs' motion to remand. "It is the general rule that an action may be removed from state court to federal court only if a federal district court would have original jurisdiction over the…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 24, 2013 · in the opinion
Keeney v. AW Chesterton Company (2013)
…however, to the general rule that \"the voluntary acceptance of the benefit of a judgment or order is a bar to the prosecution of an appeal therefrom..." ... where the appellant's right to the accepted portion…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · November 27, 2017 · in the opinion
Donohue v. CBS Corporation (2017)
…notices of removal, there are nearly two dozen other defendants involved in this action. As a general matter, "the consent of all defendants in a multiparty case is a precondition to removal." Green v. Nat's…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 16, 2017 · in the opinion
Charlevoix v. John Crane (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…must "assess the general features of the type of incident involved," to determine whether the incident has "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce\[.\]" Second, a court must determine whether "the general character" of the "activity…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 8, 2017 · in the opinion
Charlevoix v. Caterpillar, Inc. (2017)
…must "assess the general features of the type of incident involved," to determine whether the incident has "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce\[.\]" Second, a court must determine whether "the general character" of the "activity…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 27, 2013 · in the opinion
Jones v. John Crane, Inc. (2013)
…I.\[4\] Except as to the named defendants, the FAC in Jones II was identical to the Jones I complaint with regard to the language in the general allegations, the first cause of action for negligence…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · July 7, 2017 · in the opinion
Carroll v. John Crane, Inc. (2017)
…defendant's broadly-worded motion is GRANTED only as to any general references to the time or money spent defending this lawsuit and as to any references to defendant's wealth during the liability phase of…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion
Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)
…No. 828 684, Answers of Defendant John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. in Response to General Order No. 29 Interrogatories 6:4-18, 12:4-7). Defendant's gasket sheet materials were "various shades of grey, with Defendant…