No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

13 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · October 21, 2022 · in the opinion

    Pritt v. John Crane, Inc. (2022)

    …County Superior Court in November, 2020 against John Crane, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, General Electric Company and Viacom CBS Inc. John Crane removed the case to this Court in December, 2020. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 6, 2019 · in the opinion

    Varney v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

    …known as Bell and Gossett Company formerly known as ITT Marlow, Defendants, represented by Ronald C. Gardner, GARDNER TRABOLSI & ASSOC. PLLC. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Alice Coles Serko, TANENBAUM KEALE LLP, Christopher S. Marks…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · April 12, 2017 · in the opinion

    Carroll v. Abb, Inc. (2017)

    …motion for summary judgment (dkt. \#253) is DENIED. 3) Plaintiff Patricia Carroll's motion to strike (dkt. \#403) is DENIED AS MOOT. 4) Defendants General Electric Company, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, and FMC Corporation are DISMISSED…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · October 21, 2022 · in the opinion

    Pritt v. John Crane, Inc. (2022)

    …for Middlesex County in November, 2020 against John Crane, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, General Electric Company and Viacom CBS Inc. John Crane removed the case to this Court in December, 2020. Plaintiffs then filed an amended…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 16, 2023 · in the opinion

    Hutchins v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2023)

    …454-6, at 14). Though both experts opined that, in general, Mr. Hutchins's work on steamships exposed him to asbestos enough to be a substantial factor in bringing about his mesothelioma, neither expert established significant…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · November 17, 2015 · in the opinion

    Stallings v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation (2015)

    …526 U.S. 137, 147-49 (1999) (applying Daubert's general principles to the expert matters discussed in Rule 702). First, the Court must determine "whether the experts' testimony reflects \scientific knowledge,' whether their findings are…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 11, 2007 · in the opinion

    Cadlo v. Metalclad Insulation Corporation (2007)

    …Cadlo's\] contraction of cancer, \[Maxlyn Cadlo\] would have continued her marital relationship with him for another 20 years." (See Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp. (1991) 230 Cal.App.3d 1125, 1152 \[briefs are reliable indications…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · April 5, 2023 · in the opinion

    Gemaehlich v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)

    …and GRANTS the Gemaehlichs' motion to remand. "It is the general rule that an action may be removed from state court to federal court only if a federal district court would have original jurisdiction over the…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 24, 2013 · in the opinion

    Keeney v. AW Chesterton Company (2013)

    …however, to the general rule that \"the voluntary acceptance of the benefit of a judgment or order is a bar to the prosecution of an appeal therefrom..." ... where the appellant's right to the accepted portion…

  10. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 22, 1989 · in the opinion

    Sholtis v. American Cyanamid Co. (1989)

    …theory of non-identification liability is acceptable in New Jersey. \[9\] The court "reserve\[d\] decision on the general appropriateness of including products with different degrees of risk in a market-share analysis." 116 N.J…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 16, 2017 · in the opinion

    Charlevoix v. John Crane (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …must "assess the general features of the type of incident involved," to determine whether the incident has "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce\[.\]" Second, a court must determine whether "the general character" of the "activity…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 8, 2017 · in the opinion

    Charlevoix v. Caterpillar, Inc. (2017)

    …must "assess the general features of the type of incident involved," to determine whether the incident has "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce\[.\]" Second, a court must determine whether "the general character" of the "activity…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion

    Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)

    …No. 828 684, Answers of Defendant John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. in Response to General Order No. 29 Interrogatories 6:4-18, 12:4-7). Defendant's gasket sheet materials were "various shades of grey, with Defendant…