No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

16 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · California Supreme Court · May 23, 2016 · in the opinion

    Webb v. Special Electric Company, Inc. (2016)

    …suppliers "to develop expertise regarding a multitude of different end-products and to investigate the actual use of raw materials by manufacturers over whom the supplier has no control." (Ibid.) Artiglio v. General Electric Co., supra…

  2. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · March 6, 2009 · in the opinion

    Cardinal Industrial Insulation Co., Inc. v. Norris (2009)

    \[1\] The Complaint named as Defendants: Cardinal Industrial Insulation Company, Inc.; Triangle Insulation and Sheetmetal Co.; General Electric Company; ACandS Inc.; Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC; Anchor Packing; John Crane, Inc.; Combustion Engineering, Inc.; RapidA-merican Corporation…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · January 31, 1986 · in the opinion

    Knauer v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

    …federal judiciary an equal power, and certainly no such judicial power could reasonably be inferred from the grant of authority to the Supreme Court to prescribe general rules of practice and procedure. When matters of state…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · April 16, 1990 · in the opinion

    Simpson v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. (1990)

    …Plaintiff's decedent, David Simpson, was employed at Rochester Gas and Electric Company from 1957 to 1988. His primary duties involved working on the steam piping system. This work brought him into extensive contact with asbestos…

  5. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York · March 15, 1989 · in the opinion

    In re Johns-Manville Corp. (1989)

    …Thus, pursuant to ¶ 10.1(B) of the Plan and the general power of this Court, the Court retains jurisdiction to determine the instant dispute. The Plan also provides in ¶ 10.1(G) that the Court…

  6. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 14, 2007

    Terrance v. Dow Chemical Company (2007)

    The court affirmed the judgment on the jury's $5,000,000 general damages verdict for the Terrance estate and surviving spouse against Exxon, and denied Exxon's JNOV, new trial and remittitur motions. Mesothelioma was…

  7. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 24, 2017

    Romano v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2017)

    …but reversed the damages ruling and raised the general damages award for the Romanos from $500,000 to $1,500,000. A solidary obligor gets a virile share credit only if the plaintiff released the other…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 8, 1987

    Swogger v. Waterman SS Corp. (1987)

    …contribution and indemnity are not barred by New York's General Obligations Law. Maritime Law and Navy Ships Worksites: engine rooms of some 13 vessels marine engineer engine rooms of some 13 vessels more than 35…

  9. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · May 7, 1986

    Silver v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

    …§ 1-50(6), barred the claim because his last exposure was in 1961. The Fourth Circuit agreed that the statute applies to wrongful death actions in general. It held, however, that the statute did not apply…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · October 3, 1989

    Swogger v. Waterman SS Corp. (1989)

    …on the high seas, admiralty law rather than state law applies to the related third-party contribution and indemnity claims, so New York General Obligations Law § 15-108 does not bar contribution. Fault, Apportionment and Settlement…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · November 12, 1990 · in the opinion

    Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1990)

    …to concurrently produce a single injury, the plaintiff may recover from the defendant for the entire injury. Shipp v. General Motors Corporation, 750 F.2d 418, 425-26 (5th Cir.1985). The plaintiff need only show…

  12. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · February 6, 1992 · in the opinion

    Ocasek v. Manville Corp. Asbestos Comp. Fund (1992)

    …both Illinois and federal statutes. Neither, however, is controlling here. Although, as a general matter, the Illinois Code provides that "\[e\]very judgment shall bear interest thereon ...," Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. [\154] 110, para. 12-109…

  13. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York · June 30, 2016 · in the opinion

    In re Johns-Manville Corp. (2016)

    …Debtors including, without limitation, all obligations or liabilities for compensatory damages (such as loss of consortium, wrongful death, survivorship, proximate, consequential, general and special damages) and punitive damages. . . . Graphic's Mot. Ex. N, at 55. There…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 27, 2021 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. JM Manufacturing Co., Inc. (2021)

    …litigant to rely on abstract generalities, but must instruct in specific terms that relate the party's [\1088] theory to the particular case." (Soule v. General Motors Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th 548, 572 \[34 Cal…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · June 7, 1984 · in the opinion

    Bauer v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1984)

    …the plaintiff has cited a number of cases stating the general rule regarding retroactive application of statutes of limitation: statutes of limitation are ordinarily considered procedural and are retroactively applied to actions pending on or brought…

  16. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · September 30, 1983 · in the opinion

    Christman v. Dravo Corp. (1983)

    …232, 100 L.Ed. 133 (1956). See Director, OWCP v. Perini North River Associates, supra; Edmonds v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 443 U.S. 256, 263, 99 S.Ct. 2753, 2757, 61 L.Ed.2d 621 (1979)…