Search

• Organization: Johns-Manville Sales Corporation ×
• Clear filters

27 results for “General Electric”, page 2 of 2

1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · March 23, 1984 · in the opinion

   Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1984)

   …not prove that he presently suffers from that disease. In arguing that the cancer evidence was properly admissible, Jackson relies on the general rule of tort law that allows for recovery of all harms — past, present…

2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Columbia · October 28, 1981 · in the opinion

   Fearson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1981)

   …The defendants' first argument is that plaintiff's "survival" claim is time-barred under the law of the District of Columbia, which provides that the general period of limitations is three years. See D.C.Code …

3. Court case · New York Court of Appeals · October 29, 1981 · in the opinion

   Matter of Steinhardt v. JohnsManville Corp. (1981)

   …such claims are diligently and expeditiously pursued. An exception to the general period of limitation rule is required when the pathological effect of an injury occurs without perceptible trauma, and the victim is blamelessly ignorant of…

4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · September 11, 1986 · in the opinion

   Vigiolto v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

   …Applicable Law. We begin with the proposition that in a tort action, as a general rule, proof that a [\1457] specific defendant caused the plaintiff's harm is a prerequisite to that defendant's liability to…

5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · October 5, 1981 · in the opinion

   White v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1981)

   …admiralty jurisdiction and rejected claims under the Extension of Admiralty Act, 46 U.S.C. § 740, or the general maritime law, 28 U.S.C. § 1333, because the alleged injuries bore no reasonable relationship to traditional…

6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · February 24, 1981 · in the opinion

   Austin v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1981)

   …Counts V and VI seek contribution or indemnification by BIW for any damages plaintiff may recover against Armstrong Cork. II BIW's motion for summary judgment presents three general issues: (1) Do the allegations of wilful…

7. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 8, 1982 · in the opinion

   White v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1982)

   …However, an occupational disease is not an "injury" that is susceptible of such precise determination since occupational diseases in general are progressive diseases that develop over a long period of time. The symptoms of an occupational…