61 results for “General Electric”, page 3 of 4
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 5, 2020 · in the opinion
English v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…2). The July 12, 2019 Decision and Order stated that there is no general jurisdiction because the defendants are not incorporated, nor maintain their principal places of business in the State of New York. It was…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 11, 2020 · in the opinion
Olson v. Brenntag N. Am., Inc. (2020)
…not the admissibility, of Dr. Webber's testimony. \[61\] Indeed, this court rejected plaintiffs' otherwise-meritorious general challenge to Dr. Gibbs's expert disclosure for failure to raise that challenge before trial. (See Tr. at 4061…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · June 23, 2020 · in the opinion
Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson (2020)
…forth sufficient minimum contacts between Defendants and Missouri to allow the court to exercise personal jurisdiction over them on the Non-Resident Plaintiffs' claims. "Courts recognize two categories of personal jurisdiction: general and specific." Ristesund v…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of New Jersey · April 18, 2023 · in the opinion
In re Ltl Management, LLC (2023)
…398 F.3d 1098, 1100 (9th Cir. 2005) (holding that lower court had jurisdiction to determine whether the automatic stay of the Texas bankruptcy court applied to the Attorney General's suit). Therefore, the instant matter…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · December 28, 2023 · in the opinion
Hall v. Johnson & Johnson (2023)
…2015, are "general value-oriented statements" that do not specifically address the Talc Products or make any specific claims about the Company's quality assurance process and procedures, and as such those statements were dismissed by…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of New Jersey · January 20, 2022 · in the opinion
In re Ltl Management, LLC. (2022)
…brought to the U.S. Trustee's attention and that inappropriate actions on the U.S. Trustee's part would be frowned upon by the United States Attorney General. The simpler solution, in this Court's…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 9, 2019 · in the opinion
Hardman v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…the remaining parties in this action, the County Clerk, and the Trial Support Clerk in the General Clerk's Office who shall mark their records accordingly, and it is further, ORDERED, that Bristol-Myers Squibb Co…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 8, 2020 · in the opinion
Germain v. Whittaker Clark & Daniels (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…of this Order with Notice of Entry pursuant to NYSCEF e-filing protocol on the remaining parties, the General Clerk's Office and the County Clerk's Office, who are directed to mark their records accordingly…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · October 24, 2019 · in the opinion
Williams v. Avon Products, Inc. (2019)
…limiting products liability actions against nonmanufacturing sellers. Section 82.003 established a general rule that a nonmanufacturing seller is not liable for harm caused by a defective product. This limitation was enacted to protect "innocent sellers…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 28, 2019 · in the opinion
Olson v. Brenntag N. AM. Inc. (2019)
…357.) Thus, evidence that a defendant's conduct injured "nonparties can help to show that the conduct that harmed the plaintiff also posed a substantial risk of harm to the general public, and so was particularly…
-
Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · October 28, 2021 · in the opinion
Johnson & Johnson v. Shiver (2021)
…limitation could prompt unimpaired claimants to bring suit to protect their ability to recover.\[5\] The General Assembly explicitly stated that the purpose of the Act was to give priority to claimants who could demonstrate actual…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 3, 2021 · in the opinion
Milan-Leal v. Brenntag N. AM. (2021)
…exposure to a toxin; (2) that the toxin is capable of causing the particular illness, or "general causation"; and (3) that plaintiff was exposed to sufficient levels of the toxin to cause the illness, or "specific…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of New York · July 13, 2020 · in the opinion
Castro v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2020)
…38-39 (2d Cir. 1997) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). "Where a party only raises general objections, a district court need only satisfy itself there is no clear error on the face of the record…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of New York · April 29, 2020 · in the opinion
Castro v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2020)
…38-39 (2d Cir. 1997) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). "Where a party only raises general objections, a district court need only satisfy itself there is no clear error on the face of the record…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 13, 2020 · in the opinion
Rothlein v. Whittaker Clark & Daniels (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…of this Order with Notice of Entry pursuant to NYSCEF e-filing protocol on the remaining parties, the General Clerk's Office and the County Clerk's Office, who are directed to mark their records accordingly…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 5, 2021 · in the opinion
Leavitt v. Johnson & Johnson (2021)
…the studies and other information cited by experts adequately support the conclusion that the expert's general theory or technique is valid.' \[Citation.\] The goal of trial court gatekeeping is simply to exclude \clearly invalid and…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 1, 2023 · in the opinion
Chenet v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (2023)
…misplaced. Unlike in Thomas, the trial court judge made only a general statement regarding potential appellate court reversal —the trial court commented that this court had reversed his prior decisions in other unrelated cases. Likewise, the…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 14, 2018 · in the opinion
Rothlein v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…Co., 294 A.D. 2d 900, 741 N.Y.S. 2d 803 \[4th Dept. 2002\], CPLR § 2001 and Status General Development, Inc. v. 501 Broadway Partners, LLC, 163 A.D. 3d 740, 82 N.Y.S…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York · July 31, 2019 · in the opinion
LaFLAIR v. Johnson & Johnson (2019)
…thus requiring the Court to interpret each allegation as against Kolmar individually. While these "general allegation\[s\] would arguably be insufficient under federal pleading standards, the question at this stage is whether Plaintiff\['s\] pleadings are…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Oregon · May 23, 2019 · in the opinion
Levin v. Johnson & Johnson (2019)
…S. Gypsum Co., 285 B.R. 460, 475 (D. Or. 2002). Section 1452(b) has been understood to permit remand based on general fairness and reasonableness considerations. Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, 516 U.S. 124…