14 results for “Ford Motor Company”
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · January 29, 2021 · in the opinion
Hayes v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2021)
…our Supreme Court cautions against "instructions getting into evidentiary matters, subquestions which better practice suggests should be omitted from the instructions and left to the lawyers to flesh out in closing arguments." Ford Motor Co. v…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · October 24, 2019 · in the opinion
Williams v. Avon Products, Inc. (2019)
…2:17-CV-86, 2017 WL 3033425, at [\4] (S.D. Tex. July 18, 2017) (quoting Garcia v. Ford Motor Co., No. 1:12-CV-181, 2013 WL 12137090, at [\3] (S.D. Tex. May 10…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · December 28, 2023 · in the opinion
Hall v. Johnson & Johnson (2023)
…512 (3d Cir. 1976) (finding that "a district court is obliged to take cognizance of a changed factual situation and may alter an earlier \[certification\] order accordingly"); Bayshore Ford Truck v. Ford Motor Co., Civ. No…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · April 27, 2020 · in the opinion
In re Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Products (2020)
…study has been subject to peer review "does not equate with reliability," but it does suggest that good science was used by the authors. Oddi v. Ford Motor Co., 234 F.3d 136, 145 (3d Cir…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · June 23, 2020 · in the opinion
Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson (2020)
…App. W.D. 2000). The second is where an agency relationship is established between a parent corporation and its subsidiary. See State ex rel. Ford Motor Co. v. Bacon, 63 S.W.3d 641, 642 (Mo…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 19, 2018 · in the opinion
Shulman v. Brenntag N. AM., Inc. (2018)
…of fact exist as to whether JJBP used by Ms. Shulman was contaminated with asbestos and defective, or unsuited for its purpose (See Denny v. Ford Motor Co., 87 N.Y. 2d 248, 662 N.E…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 13, 2018 · in the opinion
Garrido v. Johnson & Johnson (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…of fact exist as to whether JJBP used by Mrs. Garrido was contaminated with asbestos and defective, or unsuited for its purpose (See Denny v. Ford Motor Co., 87 N.Y. 2d 248, 662 N.E…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · July 25, 2021 · in the opinion
In re Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Products Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (2021)
…case that J&J has the burden of proving that the attorney-client privilege and/or work-product doctrine applies. See, e.g., Johnson v. Ford Motor Co., C.A. No. 13-06529, 2015 WL 5193568…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 14, 2018 · in the opinion
Rothlein v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…fact exist as to whether the JBP used by Mr. Rothlein was contaminated with asbestos and defective, or unsuited for its purpose (See Denny v. Ford Motor Co., 87 N.Y. 2d 248, 662 N.E…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · December 27, 2019 · in the opinion
Hall v. Johnson & Johnson (2019)
…a connection with the purchase or sale of a security, (4) reliance, (5) economic loss, and (6) loss causation." Gold v. Ford Motor Co., 577 F. App'x 120, 122 (3d Cir. 2014) (citing Dura Pharms.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Oregon · December 28, 2023 · in the opinion
Chatfield v. Brenntag North America, Inc. (2023)
…under Oregon law, the seller of a defective product may be sued in tort for products liability. Pl. Mot. 11 (citing Heaton v. Ford Motor Co., 248 Or. 467, 470, 435 P.2d 806, 808 (1967…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 28, 2019 · in the opinion
Olson v. Brenntag N. AM. Inc. (2019)
…414 F Supp 255, 264-265 \[ED Pa 1976\]; Bennett v Greeley Gas Co., 969 P2d 754, 761 \[Colo App 1998\]; Byers v Santiam Ford, Inc., 281 Or 411, 416, 574 P2d 1122, 1124-1125 \[1978…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · February 26, 2019 · in the opinion
Shanahan v. Kolmar Laboratories, Inc. (2019)
…as a successor-in-interest to Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc., Defendants, represented by Daniel Robert Kuszmerski, Barrett, Lazar & Lincoln, LLC. Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, Imerys Talc America, Inc., individually, Imerys USA, Inc. & Imerys Talc Vermont, Inc.…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 11, 2020 · in the opinion
Olson v. Brenntag N. Am., Inc. (2020)
…No. 829 at 125.) But that calculation presumes that the two defendant companies will each pay the full amount of the $25 million compensatory award, which is logically impossible. (See Grabinski v Blue Springs Ford Sales…