No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

20 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 31, 2018

    Crozier v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …complaint and cross-claims for lack of personal jurisdiction, and denied jurisdictional discovery. New York courts lacked general jurisdiction over corporations not incorporated or headquartered in New York, and lacked specific jurisdiction under CPLR 302(a…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 12, 2019

    English v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …to dismiss the plaintiffs' complaint and all cross-claims against them for lack of personal jurisdiction, ruling against plaintiffs English and Raso. New York courts lacked general jurisdiction over New Jersey-incorporated, New Jersey-headquartered defendants…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 18, 2018

    Germain v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …The court found the defendants had made an initial showing, but the plaintiffs' experts raised fact issues on general and specific causation. It noted that conflicting expert evidence and credibility questions must be resolved by a…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 20, 2020

    English v. Avon Prods., Inc. (2020)

    …the New York court to dismiss the case for lack of personal jurisdiction. The court found it could not exercise general jurisdiction because Shulton was not incorporated or headquartered in New York. It found specific jurisdiction…

  5. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 21, 2019

    Hernandez v. Whittaker, Clark & Daniels (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …plaintiff's proof; it must make a prima facie showing that its product could not have contributed to the illness, and conflicting expert evidence on general and specific causation raises fact issues. Causation; Product Identification; Expert…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · February 26, 2019

    Shanahan v. Kolmar Laboratories, Inc. (2019)

    …non-diverse defendant in state court; under New York's lenient pleading standard, general allegations of manufacture and a disputed contract-specifications defense did not meet that burden. Venue, Removal and Transfer; Trial Procedure and Discovery

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 20, 2020 · in the opinion

    Minassian v. Kolmar Laboratories (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …notice to the party seeking discovery, and specifically requires that the party withholding disclosure state: "(1) the type of document; (2) the general subject matter of the document; (3) the date of the document; and (4)…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 9, 2019 · in the opinion

    Slonim v. J & R Film Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …are directed to serve a copy of this Order with Notice of Entry on the Trial Support Clerk in the General Clerk's Office (room 119) and the County Clerk (room 141b) who are directed to…

  9. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 5, 2020 · in the opinion

    English v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …2). The July 12, 2019 Decision and Order stated that there is no general jurisdiction because the defendants are not incorporated, nor maintain their principal places of business in the State of New York. It was…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 11, 2020 · in the opinion

    Olson v. Brenntag N. Am., Inc. (2020)

    …not the admissibility, of Dr. Webber's testimony. \[61\] Indeed, this court rejected plaintiffs' otherwise-meritorious general challenge to Dr. Gibbs's expert disclosure for failure to raise that challenge before trial. (See Tr. at 4061…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 9, 2019 · in the opinion

    Hardman v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …the remaining parties in this action, the County Clerk, and the Trial Support Clerk in the General Clerk's Office who shall mark their records accordingly, and it is further, ORDERED, that Bristol-Myers Squibb Co…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 8, 2020 · in the opinion

    Germain v. Whittaker Clark & Daniels (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …of this Order with Notice of Entry pursuant to NYSCEF e-filing protocol on the remaining parties, the General Clerk's Office and the County Clerk's Office, who are directed to mark their records accordingly…

  13. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    Olson v. Brenntag N. AM. Inc. (2019)

    …357.) Thus, evidence that a defendant's conduct injured "nonparties can help to show that the conduct that harmed the plaintiff also posed a substantial risk of harm to the general public, and so was particularly…

  14. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 3, 2021 · in the opinion

    Milan-Leal v. Brenntag N. AM. (2021)

    …exposure to a toxin; (2) that the toxin is capable of causing the particular illness, or "general causation"; and (3) that plaintiff was exposed to sufficient levels of the toxin to cause the illness, or "specific…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of New York · July 13, 2020 · in the opinion

    Castro v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2020)

    …38-39 (2d Cir. 1997) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). "Where a party only raises general objections, a district court need only satisfy itself there is no clear error on the face of the record…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of New York · April 29, 2020 · in the opinion

    Castro v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2020)

    …38-39 (2d Cir. 1997) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). "Where a party only raises general objections, a district court need only satisfy itself there is no clear error on the face of the record…

  17. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 13, 2020 · in the opinion

    Rothlein v. Whittaker Clark & Daniels (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …of this Order with Notice of Entry pursuant to NYSCEF e-filing protocol on the remaining parties, the General Clerk's Office and the County Clerk's Office, who are directed to mark their records accordingly…

  18. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 14, 2018 · in the opinion

    Rothlein v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …Co., 294 A.D. 2d 900, 741 N.Y.S. 2d 803 \[4th Dept. 2002\], CPLR § 2001 and Status General Development, Inc. v. 501 Broadway Partners, LLC, 163 A.D. 3d 740, 82 N.Y.S…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York · July 31, 2019 · in the opinion

    LaFLAIR v. Johnson & Johnson (2019)

    …thus requiring the Court to interpret each allegation as against Kolmar individually. While these "general allegation\[s\] would arguably be insufficient under federal pleading standards, the question at this stage is whether Plaintiff\['s\] pleadings are…

  20. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · July 19, 2022 · in the opinion

    Olson v. Johnson & Johnson (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2022)

    …exposure to a toxin, that the toxin is capable of causing the particular illness (general causation) and that plaintiff was exposed to sufficient levels of the toxin to cause the illness (specific causation)"\]; Dyer v Amchem…