No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

8 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 8, 2010

    Horn v. A.W. Chesterson Co. (In re Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2010)

    Ten asbestos cases, brought by plaintiffs represented by the same law firm, were assigned to one New York County judge for trial. Eight of the plaintiffs, alleging mesothelioma, asked the court to consolidate their cases into three groups for joint…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 17, 2016 · in the opinion

    Cicio v. American Biltrite (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2016)

    …and insulation. In the 1970s, Keeny worked for PSI, a division of Warner Electric, as a senior applications engineer and regional sales manager, where he inspected brakes and clutches at various commercial and industrial worksites, including…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 24, 2019

    Godfrey v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …as to Kaiser Gypsum. A defendant that preserved its personal jurisdiction defense in its answer is not subject to general jurisdiction in New York unless it is incorporated or has its principal place of business there…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 14, 2020

    Montell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …and cross-claims against it, and denied the plaintiffs' cross-motion for jurisdictional discovery. A New York court lacks general jurisdiction over a corporation not incorporated or headquartered in New York, and lacks specific jurisdiction under…

  5. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · May 21, 2024

    Seen v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2024)

    …suffering award that deviates materially from reasonable compensation under CPLR 5501(c) must be reduced or retried, and under General Obligations Law § 15-108 settlement amounts paid by settling defendants are deducted from the total award…

  6. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 19, 2014 · in the opinion

    Konstantin v. 640 Third Ave. Assoc. (2014)

    …or other misconduct of an adverse party. In its reply memorandum, Tishman cites the "general interests of justice," as additional grounds for granting the subpoenas. Tishman's motion is primarily based on the contention that plaintiff…

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 23, 2014 · in the opinion

    Konstantin v. 640 Third Ave. Assoc. (2014)

    … In its reply memorandum, Tishman cites the "general interests of justice," as additional grounds for granting the subpoenas. Tishman's motion is primarily based on the contention that plaintiff withheld discovery during the pendency of the…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 15, 2023 · in the opinion

    Seen v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc. (2023)

    …to a toxin, that the toxin is capable of causing the particular illness (general causation) and that plaintiff was exposed to sufficient levels of the toxin to cause the illness (specific causation)." Nemeth II, 38 N…