No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

9 results for “Owens-Illinois”

  1. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 15, 2018 · in the opinion

    Lamorak Ins. Co. v. Kone, Inc. (2018)

    …in this case, but also in all of the other cases involving claims against Kone for injury due to asbestos exposure. Accordingly, we find that Illinois Supreme Court Rule 304(a) (eff. Mar. 8, 2016) gives…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 27, 2020 · in the opinion

    Broussard v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2020)

    …PRAC. & PROC.§ 3733 (Rev. 4th ed.)(citing Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co., LLC v. Owens, 574 U.S. 81, 89 (2014)(in context of diversity removal, only a "plausible" allegation of amount in controversy is required))…

  3. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 26, 2018 · in the opinion

    Melancon v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2018)

    …2:17-CV-12367. Before: JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.\[\\] This case is the latest in an ever-increasing line of cases brought by former Huntington Ingalls employees or their family members in…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 10, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)

    …2d 1164, 1168 (La. 1991). Further, the same principal of limited shareholder liability "applies where one corporation wholly owns another." Bujol, 922 So. 2d at 1127. Courts may disregard the concept of corporate separateness, or "pierce…

  5. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 14, 2020 · in the opinion

    Luca v. The Neslemur Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 19, 2018 · in the opinion

    Melancon v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2018)

    …F.3d at 173). Remand is proper when defendants can show only that the government owns the relevant vessels and fails to produce evidence that the government distributed safety procedures regarding use of asbestos. See Bartel…

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 28, 2020 · in the opinion

    Germain v. The Neslemur Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state" (CPLR …

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 20, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)

    …Fed. R. Evid. 702. But experts may not provide "legal conclusions or. . . simply tell the jury what result to reach." Owen v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 698 F.2d 236, 240 (5th Cir. 1983); McBroom v. Payne…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 7, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)

    …corporate representative of Entergy New Orleans, Inc. ("Entergy"),\[20\] which owns and operates the Nine Mile Point plant. The deposition was taken as part of an asbestos case in Louisiana state court. In its reply memorandum…