No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · April 27, 2021 · in the opinion

    Connor v. Covil Corporation (2021)

    …EMERSON ELECTRIC COMPANY; FLOWSERVE US, INC., individually and as successor to BYRON JACKSON PUMP COMPANY; FLUOR CONSTRUCTORS INTERNATIONAL, f/k/a Fluor Corporation; FLUOR CONSTRUCTORS INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED; FLUOR DANIEL SERVICES CORPORATION; FLUOR ENTERPRISES, INC.; GENERAL ELECTRIC…

  2. Court case · West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals · March 12, 2009

    Ratliff v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co. (2009)

    …In 1986 he took a voluntary separation program, accepted $35,000 and signed a general release of all claims arising from his employment. He was diagnosed with mesothelioma in April 2005 and died in July 2005…

  3. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion

    Cole v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (2017)

    …chemicals. Id. at 692. Each employee had previously executed a general release in the course of settling unrelated FELA claims. Id. These releases "appeared to settle all claims for all injuries past and future." Id. In…

  4. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · September 18, 2003 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. AC & S., Inc. (2003)

    …the suit, but subsequent to the injuries, the plaintiff executed a general release freeing the railroad from liability for the injuries sustained in the accident in exchange for two hundred and fifty dollars. Callen, 332 U…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · December 11, 2018 · in the opinion

    Connor v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (2018)

    …1979, testified that, in his role as a general foreman at the Fiber Industries facility, he ordered\[6\] insulation material from Covil because Daniel International "had a contract to buy \[insulation\] through Covil." (ECF No. 208…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana · May 14, 2010 · in the opinion

    Aurand v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (2010)

    …See Forry, 837 F.2d at 263 (emphasizing that FELA release interpretation must take the parties' intent into account and that "general language of release will not encompass claims of which the releasor was unaware"). Norfolk…