No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

60 results for “General Electric”, page 3 of 3

  1. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 30, 1993 · in the opinion

    Adcock v. Brakegate, Ltd. (1993)

    …under Illinois common law. However, Fahner does not represent that conclusion because it involved a statutory enforcement action brought by the Illinois Attorney General pursuant to the Illinois Antitrust Act (Ill.Rev.Stat.1975, ch. 38…

  2. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 12, 1996 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Keene Corp. (1996)

    …pleadings shall be according to the rules." 735 ILCS 5/2-201(a) (West 1994). General jurisdiction is invoked in the trial court when an action is filed and a summons is issued and served upon…

  3. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 29, 1988 · in the opinion

    Pecorino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1988)

    …accrued to him not later than 1980. Furthermore, it should be noted that when the release was signed the Pecorinos did think about any exclusions or exceptions from the general, full and final release [\570] when…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · March 23, 1998 · in the opinion

    McClain v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    …approximated $163,000 and she asked for damages for loss of society. McClain counters that a new trial is necessary where damages are awarded for only itemized special damages and nothing is awarded for general damages…

  5. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · March 3, 1997 · in the opinion

    Kurak v. AP Green Refractories Co. (1997)

    …949 F.2d 167 (5th Cir.1991), seventeen plaintiffs contended they contracted asbestos related diseases while working in their factory at General Tire and Rubber Company. The suit named thirteen producers and users of asbestos containing…

  6. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · July 21, 1995 · in the opinion

    Jadlowski v. Owens Corning (1995)

    …decision to admit this evidence rested in the sound discretion of the trial court, and the judge's decision will not be disturbed unless manifestly unjust. Ratner v. General Motors Corp., 241 N.J. Super. 197…

  7. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · June 5, 1995 · in the opinion

    Schiavo v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1995)

    …of the videotape. See State v. Wilson, 135 N.J. 4, 17, 637 A.2d 1237 (1994) and Balian v. General Motors, 121 N.J. Super. 118, 125, 296 A.2d 317 (App.Div. 1972), certif…

  8. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · May 14, 1998 · in the opinion

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Sitz (1998)

    …differently. \ \ \ \ \ \ We have concluded that the preferable approach for dealing with these problems in the federal courts is not to preclude the use of offensive collateral estoppel....The general rule should be that in cases where..…

  9. Court case · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · March 6, 1997 · in the opinion

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Henkel (1997)

    …was rendered untimely by the enactment of Section 12-311. OCF acknowledges that "the general purpose underlying Section 12-311 was to expand the period of time in which plaintiffs could sue to recover for asbestos…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 22, 1994 · in the opinion

    Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)

    …state that he saw OCF's name on Kaylo boxes at the shipyard. But the questioning reverted back to general product trade names, and Durham was asked the time period that Kaylo products were customarily used…

  11. Court case · Texas Supreme Court · June 5, 1998 · in the opinion

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Malone (1998)

    …awards by holding that procedural safeguards provide all the protection that is necessary. See, e.g., Scheufler v. General Host Corp., 126 F.3d 1261, 1272 (10 th Cir.1997); Cathey v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.…

  12. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · February 5, 1986 · in the opinion

    Jenkins v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1986)

    …The purpose of class actions is to conserve "the resources of both the courts and the parties by permitting an issue potentially affecting every \[class member\] to be litigated in an economical fashion." General Telephone Co…

  13. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · May 3, 1995 · in the opinion

    Rohrbaugh v. Celotex Corp. (1995)

    …the product left the Defendant's possession and control, and that the defect made the product unreasonably dangerous. Kirkland v. General Motors Corp., 521 P.2d 1353, 1363 (Okla.1974). The "unreasonably dangerous" prong of this…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · May 26, 1992 · in the opinion

    Rohrbaugh v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1992)

    …Appellants answered with a general denial that their products were defective and that they were negligent. The case was tried to a jury and the jury returned a verdict in favor of the Plaintiffs and against…

  15. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · October 5, 1981 · in the opinion

    White v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1981)

    …admiralty jurisdiction and rejected claims under the Extension of Admiralty Act, 46 U.S.C. § 740, or the general maritime law, 28 U.S.C. § 1333, because the alleged injuries bore no reasonable relationship to traditional…

  16. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · November 9, 2001 · in the opinion

    Emery v. Owens-Corporation (2001)

    …suitable references to plaintiff's closing argument), we issue a precautionary warning that the general reference to "witnesses" in its admissibility assertion skirts the outer perimeter of Rule 2-12.4. \[9\] See La. Acts 1979…

  17. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · November 23, 1994 · in the opinion

    Adcock v. Brakegate, Ltd. (1994)

    …the theory of civil conspiracy. (Restatement (Second) of Torts § 876, Comment c on Clause (a) (1977).) A defendant who understands the general objectives of the conspiratorial scheme, accepts them, and agrees, either explicitly or implicitly to…

  18. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 18, 1990 · in the opinion

    Howell v. Celotex Corp. (1990)

    …result of being exposed to asbestos?....\[I\]t is my understanding that there was a general agreement he suffered a pleural thickening as a result of his asbestos exposure. Now, I heard one counsel say to…

  19. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 12, 1996 · in the opinion

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Schmidt (1996)

    …of the fee against the two minor Schmidt children. Schmidt argues taxing costs against the minor plaintiffs was error because the record does not show good cause for disregarding the general requirement of TEX.R. CIV…

  20. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · September 21, 1995 · in the opinion

    Baumgart v. Keene Bldg. Products Corp. (1995)

    …835 (1967). However, we have long recognized an exception to this general rule which acts to toll the running of the limitations period. The discovery rule "provides that where the existence of the injury is not…