No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”

  1. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · August 28, 1996 · in the opinion

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett (1996)

    …analysis, and evaluation in the Construction Insulation Shop at a Union Carbide plant to resolve "unanswered health problems." Mr. Peele did not include Kaylo in the third of the three intervals of sampling because the first…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · June 6, 1995 · in the opinion

    Harris v. AC & S, Inc. (1995)

    …seeks to offer evidence through exhibits, they must be identified by affidavit or otherwise be admissible. Martz v. Union Labor Life Insurance Co., 757 F.2d 135, 138 (7th Cir.1985). "Supporting materials designed to establish…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · February 12, 1987 · in the opinion

    Rice v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1987)

    …s motion for summary judgment is denied. \[1\] It should also be noted that the cause of action in Union Supply arose prior to the effective date of CPLA and was not governed by its provisions.

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · March 23, 1993 · in the opinion

    Miller v. American President Lines, Ltd. (1993)

    …As a wiper, Moline's job was to clean up after electricians and engine room workers. Individual seamen and their union representatives made complaints about the high levels of asbestos dust, but remedial measures were minimal…

  5. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 18, 2013 · in the opinion

    Gillenwater v. Honeywell Intern., Inc. (2013)

    …warning on Kaylo packages from 1943 to 1958 and Abex's attempt in 1975 to prevent inspectors of the Occupational Health and Safety Administration from mingling with union leaders during an inspection of an Abex plant…

  6. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · April 14, 1995 · in the opinion

    Kirk v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1995)

    …defendants, including Owens-Corning Fiberglas [\152] Corporation ("Owens-Corning").\[2\] Kirk alleged that her husband's mesothelioma was caused by exposure to dust from asbestos products during his employment at the New York Shipyard in Camden…