No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

14 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · August 28, 1996 · in the opinion

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett (1996)

    …Fibreboard, Foster Wheeler, GAF Corporation, Garlock, General Electric, Owens-Illinois, Pittsburgh Corning and Westinghouse were cross-claim defendants. Crane Packing was found not liable and is not involved in this appeal. \[6\] See part III, section…

  2. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 18, 2013 · in the opinion

    Gillenwater v. Honeywell Intern., Inc. (2013)

    …participate in the conspiracy. Id. If, after resigning from General Electric, Naples had come clean and reported the conspiracy to authorities, the conspiracy — which he had helped to arrange — would have been thwarted. In the government…

  3. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · December 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Jones v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2019)

    …Texas, L.P.; Draco Mechanical Supply, Inc.; Duro Dyne Corporation; Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation; General Electric Company; General Gasket Corporation; General Refractories Co.; Georgia Pacific Corporation; The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company; Homasote Company; Honeywell International, Inc.…

  4. Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · January 22, 1997 · in the opinion

    Tallman v. WR Grace & Co.-Conn. (1997)

    …on both of them. I. The Facts. Robert Tallman was employed as an electrician on various construction projects when he came in contact with asbestos products used in the construction process. Tallman's asbestos exposure spanned…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · March 13, 1989 · in the opinion

    Miller v. Celotex Corp. (1989)

    …defendants. I conclude that plaintiff has failed to present sufficient persuasive evidence for a reasonable jury to rule in his favor on the running of the statute of limitations. See Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith…

  6. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · February 27, 1986

    Kisor v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

    …in the 1940s and 1950s, and argued that it could not be liable for a danger it did not know about. The jury returned a general verdict for Owens-Illinois. The Ninth Circuit, applying Washington law…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · July 2, 1990

    White v. Celotex Corp. (1990)

    …The Ninth Circuit affirmed. It held that the defendants' general sale of asbestos insulation during those years was not evidence that they supplied the asbestos Edward encountered. It also found market share liability unsuited to asbestos…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · April 26, 2005 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Cook (2005)

    685 (2000), addressing "whether the general rule (that no loss of consortium claim exists for an ante-nuptial tort) applies in cases where, at the time of the marriage, the injury to the spouse is latent…

  9. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · November 28, 1988 · in the opinion

    Menne v. Celotex Corp. (1988)

    …113 (3d Cir.1985) (evidence of general use of Pittsburgh Corning's Unibestos at job site was sufficient to allow jury to find Pittsburgh Corning to be a factor in causing the plaintiff's injury). \[13…

  10. Court case · Colorado Supreme Court · February 16, 1993 · in the opinion

    Fibreboard Corp. v. Fenton (1993)

    …their set-off against the total judgment owed by other tortfeasors. Had the General Assembly intended this additional requirement to be met prior to set-off, it simply could have included a provision so requiring in…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 16, 2007 · in the opinion

    Garcia v. Duro Dyne Corporation (2007)

    …(Owens); (2) distributors including Thorpe Insulation Company (Thorpe) and Bell Industries, Inc. (Bell),\[1\] and (3) general contractors including Holmes and Narver, Inc. (Holmes). The Garcias proceeded to trial against just two defendants, Duro Dyne and…

  12. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 10, 2018 · in the opinion

    Jones v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2018)

    …affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. General Casualty Insurance Co. v. Lacey, 199…

  13. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 7, 2021 · in the opinion

    Jones v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2021)

    …marks omitted.) Id. In contrast, a defendant who understands the general objectives of a conspiratorial scheme and agrees to do its part to further those objectives is liable as a conspirator. Id. ¶ 13 Because a conspiracy…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · September 30, 2016 · in the opinion

    Suoja v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2016)

    …has not met his burden of establishing that this exposure was a substantial factor in causing Suoja's mesothelioma. [\1207] Defendant does not dispute as a general matter that exposure to asbestos caused Suoja's mesothelioma…