No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

8 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · March 28, 1986 · in the opinion

    Roehling v. Nat. Gypsum Co. Gold Bond Bldg. (1986)

    …BUILDING PRODUCTS; Owens-Illinois, Inc. and The Celotex Company, Successor-In-Interest to Philip Carey Corporation, Appellees, and Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Successor by Purchase of Kaylo Division of Owens-Illinois Glass Co.; Pittsburgh Corning Corp.;…

  2. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 29, 2003 · in the opinion

    Caruso v. M & O Insulation Co. (2003)

    …ACandS, 340 Md. at 366, 667 A.2d at 131. Owens-Corning did not stop manufacturing asbestos-containing Kaylo until 1972. McClure [\332] v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 188 Ill.2d 102, 116, 241 Ill.Dec…

  3. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · July 21, 1992 · in the opinion

    Kreppein v. Celotex Corp. (1992)

    …Inc., individually and as successor to Southern Textile Corporation and Southern Asbestos Company; Fibreboard Corporation; Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation, individually and as successor-in-interest to Unarco Industries; United States Gypsum Company; Raymark Industries…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · February 26, 1990

    Raney v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1990)

    …Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment of about $450,000 for the widow, Edna Raney, against Owens-Illinois, Celotex and Raymark, holding the evidence let the jury find the missing asbestos warnings were a proximate…

  5. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 11, 2009

    Burger v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2009)

    …Cork, DAP, Pneumo Abex and Owens-Illinois, ruling against Jon and Lois Burger. A plaintiff opposing summary judgment in an asbestos case must produce evidence that he inhaled asbestos fibers from the particular defendant's product…

  6. Court case · Indiana Supreme Court · March 2, 2016

    Myers v. Crouse-Hinds Division OF Cooper Industries, Inc. (2016)

    The Indiana Supreme Court affirmed the denial of summary judgment to General Electric and Owens-Illinois in the Geyman case and reversed summary judgment for Crouse-Hinds and the other defendants in the Myers case, so…

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 4, 2015

    Brady v. Crane Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)

    Plaintiffs asked the New York County Supreme Court to consolidate thirteen asbestos cases for joint trial in two groups. All but one of the plaintiffs had lung cancer. Miceli and Ward had mesothelioma. Most had died, and Miller and Morgan were…

  8. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · April 19, 1982

    Beshada v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. (1982)

    Six consolidated cases were brought by workers, or the survivors of deceased workers, against makers and distributors of asbestos products. The workers said they were exposed to asbestos on the job. They claimed illnesses including asbestosis and…