54 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 3 of 3
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · March 5, 1986 · in the opinion
Herber v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)
…Carey Canadian, a subsidiary of Jim Waters, Inc.); Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.; Owens- Corning Fiberglas Corporation; Forty-Eight Insulation, Inc.; Nicolet Industries, Inc.; Pittsburgh Corning Corporation; GAF Corporation; Celotex Corporation; Armstrong Cork Company; Unarco Industries Inc.; H…
-
Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · September 13, 1995 · in the opinion
Horton v. Harwick Chem. Corp. (1995)
…America. Davis & Young Co., L.P.A., and Martin J. Murphy, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation. Ronald G. Rossetti, Jr., urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Ohio Association of Civil Trial Attorneys. Vorys…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · September 10, 1973 · in the opinion
Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation (1973)
…1590. The Act gives the Secretary of Labor the authority to establish standards for permissible concentrations of airborne asbestos fibers. \[17\] The original complaint also named as defendants Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, Standard Asbestos Manufacturing and…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 25, 1982
Froud v. Celotex Corporation (1982)
Three asbestos workers, James Froud, John Friday and Wyatt Williamson, died after allegedly developing disease from prolonged exposure to asbestos products made and sold by the defendants. Froud and Friday had peritoneal mesothelioma; Williamson had…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · February 9, 2001
Boldini v. Owens Corning (2001)
…sued several companies, including Sprinkmann Sons Corporation of Illinois, which installed insulation and was an authorized distributor of Owens-Corning products. Plaintiffs claimed Sprinkmann sold and distributed asbestos-containing materials to the plant; they made no…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 23, 1999
Pittsburgh Corning Corp. v. James (1999)
The Court of Appeals of Maryland affirmed the Court of Special Appeals' dismissal of Pittsburgh Corning's and Owens Corning's appeals, holding that denial of their motions to dismiss for inconvenient forum could not be…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 24, 2013 · in the opinion
In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2013)
…Pittsburgh Corning allegedly had responsibility. See Garlock Exhibits 121, 132 165, 167, 178, 174, and 203. For example, the discovery response marked as Exhibit 203 identifies ten bankrupt entities, including Armstrong, Babcock & Wilcox, Fibreboard, Owens Corning…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 16, 2013 · in the opinion
In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2013)
…Pittsburgh Corning allegedly had responsibility. See Garlock Exhibits 121, 132 165, 167, 178, 174, and 203. For example, the discovery response marked as Exhibit 203 identifies 10 bankrupt entities, including Armstrong, Babcock & Wilcox, Fibreboard, Owens Corning…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · October 7, 2011
In re ACandS, Inc. (2011)
…filed by asbestos plaintiffs' law firms in a dozen other asbestos bankruptcy cases, including Pittsburgh Corning, W.R. Grace, Flintkote and Owens Corning. It also asked to intervene in those cases and to reopen the ones…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · April 11, 2000
In re Patenaude (2000)
Three groups of plaintiffs from New York, Georgia and Oregon sued asbestos defendants for personal injury and wrongful death. Their injuries ranged from mesothelioma to non-malignant pleural disease, and many had died. Their federal cases had been…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · November 19, 1984 · in the opinion
Colombo v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1984)
601 F.Supp. 1119 (1984) George A. and Mary Rose COLOMBO v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION, etal. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES of America. Civ. A. No. 82-0685. November 19, 1984. United States District Court…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · September 15, 1986 · in the opinion
Dykes v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1986)
…969, 99 S.Ct. 461, 58 L.Ed.2d 428 (1978)). In a more recent decision, Murphy v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 779 F.2d 340 (6th Cir.1985), our court, speaking through Judge Kennedy, upheld the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · September 30, 2014 · in the opinion
Mt. McKinley Ins. Co. v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. (2014)
…951 (1995). Should either PPG or Corning breach a contractual duty it owes under the policies, Mt. McKinley may assert that as a defense in coverage litigation. Neither PPG nor Corning may claim that § 6.5…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · June 16, 2011 · in the opinion
In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2011)
…times, (4) PPG and PCC have joint insurance coverage, (5) PPG permitted PCC to participate in its insurance coverage program, and (6) provided certain services to PCC." In re Pittsburgh Corning, 417 B.R. at 296…